 |
|
|
|
 |
tribu
Guest
Registered: Not Yet
Location:
|
|
|
I started with a clean (80 GB) hard disk, no partitions.
Using Linux's setup, I created a Reiser partition and a swap partition, then installed Linux onto it.
Once Linux was installed and setup, I booted my Windows (2000) cd to install Windows. I created an NTFS partition and installed it, creating other partitions for personal use with the remaining space.
Once Windows was ready, I booted my linux cd and restored the Grub boot loader. It immediately recognized borth partitions and gives me a nice gooey when Im booting.
|
|
Jul-22-2005 21:34
|
|
|
 |
 |
placebo
501xx

Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Somewhere
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by tribu
I started with a clean (80 GB) hard disk, no partitions.
Using Linux's setup, I created a Reiser partition and a swap partition, then installed Linux onto it.
Once Linux was installed and setup, I booted my Windows (2000) cd to install Windows. I created an NTFS partition and installed it, creating other partitions for personal use with the remaining space.
Once Windows was ready, I booted my linux cd and restored the Grub boot loader. It immediately recognized borth partitions and gives me a nice gooey when Im booting. |
What distro of Linux do you use? I'm currently running Gentoo with GNOME 2.10 as my Desktop Manager, its kinda slow, but the system I'm using is a P2 IBM thinkpad. Only thing I'm having trouble with is getting my wireless internet to work, fucking pain in the ass. I really wish there was a straight forward guide for it, but there isn't.
___________________
"We did not choose to become robots. There was an accident in our studio. We were working on our sampler, and at exactly 9:09 a.m. on September 9, 1999, it exploded. When we regained consciousness, we discovered that we had become robots."
|
|
Jul-22-2005 23:01
|
|
|
 |
 |
tribu
Guest
Registered: Not Yet
Location:
|
|
|
SuSE 9.0 pro.
I got it for 20 bucks, and its been worth every penny. The user community is a decent size too which makes problem/solution an often painless process...
Last edited by on Jul-22-2005 at 23:16
|
|
Jul-22-2005 23:03
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
smokeape
Lowland Trance Addict

Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Heart of Dixie
|
|
|
Re: Microsoft Windows 2000, Microsoft Windows XP...
| quote: | Originally posted by tribu
Microsoft Windows Vista.
Apparently, Microsoft chose this name for it's newest incarnation of Windows (codename - Longhorn)which, according to the Redmond software conglomorate, should be beta testing this fall and debuting next year. This name was chosen to describe the clarity of the digital world which Windows can display. Aside from having all the latest security patches and more secure encryption (and more than a handful of anti-piracy safegaurds, Microsoft is also promising an updated user interface, faster search functions, and virtual folders.
All in all, some wonder how stable this first release will be. Microsoft does not have a history of stable first releases as their Second Editions and sceurity patches have shown. Though insisting that they've started from scratch on the code, Microsoft has alot of old features and lines which will undoubtedly make their way into this version. This could be a good product, about a year after it's release when all the bugs of mass distribution are worked out.
|
This is supposed to give us the 64 bit file system, you fool. I'm slobbering already. We've lived with 32 bit file systems since Windows 95. You apparently don't know the quantum leap...
[[[smoke]]]
kd lang - Constant Craving
|
|
Jul-23-2005 02:52
|
|
|
 |
 |
tribu
Guest
Registered: Not Yet
Location:
|
|
|
Re: Re: Microsoft Windows 2000, Microsoft Windows XP...
| quote: | Originally posted by smokeape
This is supposed to give us the 64 bit file system, you fool. I'm slobbering already. We've lived with 32 bit file systems since Windows 95. You apparently don't know the quantum leap...
|
I know whats there, but you have to imagine that if next year is the target date, they'll be releasing 32 and 64 bit versions. I dont have the right processor, so Ill be one of the 32 bit users (most likely). Since the 64 bit system is the big focus here, I wouldn't doubt the 32 bit version will suffer.
Or an I wrong, and older chips will handle the larger architecture?
|
|
Jul-23-2005 03:05
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:29.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|