|
RIAA sues XM Inc. over the new Pioneer Inno [mind-boggling inside]
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060517..._nm/media_xm_dc
| quote: | The recording industry on Tuesday sued XM Satellite Radio Holdings Inc., alleging its Inno device that can store music infringes on copyrights and transforms a passive radio experience into the equivalent of a digital download service like iTunes.
The suit accuses XM Satellite of "massive wholesale infringement," and seeks $150,000 in damages for every song copied by XM customers using the devices, which went on sale earlier this month. XM, with more than 6.5 million subscribers, said it plays 160,000 different songs every month. |
Words can't describe this. They're suing XM because a portable device can store songs? It's made by goddamn Pioneer, not XM! The RIAA is so good at one-upping themselves.
I don't see how this is seen as 'stealing' by the RIAA - the Inno cannot transfer songs off of itself to a computer, and the end-user has already paid to listen to the damn song by having a subscription to XM in the first place. If the user wants to listen to a particular song that they enjoyed 5 times in a row, how is this different than hearing the song 5 times in an hour on the XM satellite broadcast itself? And why aren't they suing Sirius for the Starmate Replay, which does the exact same damn thing?
This had better not hamper sales of this thing, it's what I wanted to replace my iPod with.

|