|
| quote: | Originally posted by Scolomon
i hear it typically either in buildups or between songs and it sounds like a fwooooooossssshhhhhhhhhhhhh sound
djs usually use it when they are building up to drop something in
what exactly are they doing to accomplish this? |
Tbh it's probably either a part of the track or it's just the flanger (on DJM600, there isn't one on the xone62), or maybe just a high-pass filter sweep on a Xone.
As has already been said, the DJM600 fx are very overused and can sound very tacky. They can still be used to great effect, but the ways to do this subtly aren't immediately obvious and can take a fair amount of ingenuity and intuition. The Xone filters are also overused a lot of the time, or just used for very simple and easy just-for-the-sake-of-it sweeps, but they can be very useful for subtly bringing sounds in/out and creating some cool fx - again this takes a decent bit of experience and intuition to know how to do it well and ideally make it sound like part of the track playing.
I use delay/echo effects and filters quite a lot in my sets and personally I usually prefer to have the filters on the whole if I have to choose between them... for a trance/hard trance set I'd rather turn up to find a Xone62 than a DJM600 but for a techno set a lot of the time I'd rather be on a DJM600.
If you really want both filters and echo/delay fx on your mixer, you could go for the Denon DN-X1500, which has both manual filters and all of the fx the DJM600 has (apart from reverb, but with a stutter effect instead) and is packed full of other features, but it has several drawbacks: there's a slight lag on channel faders (which the Xone:62 also has), the build quality isn't quite as good as you'd hope, the filters aren't anywhere near as good as the A&H filters (but still piss all over the filter effect on the DJM600), etc... although despite all of that I'd rather play on one of them than just about any other mixer (apart from a Xone:92 with an EFX-500, maybe)
Still yet to try an Ecler NU05 but it looks very promising.
___________________
Stu Cox | 

|