|
but where do you draw the line to describe detrimental "lifestyle choices"
we drink lots and stay out to all hours of the morning, if that is deemed to be a detrimental lifestyle choice and I'm denied badly needed treatment, and instead it is given to someone else, how would I feel. They need to sit down and define the hippocratic oath. Is the purpose of a doctor to fix you when you are ill, or to guide you to being healthy.
If its the former, then I can do what I want, and they have to operate on me, to provide " equal treatment to all". if its the latter, then they have the choice to turn away certain people based on their professional opinion, which I disagree with, because some doctors are very poorly trained, and shouldn't be practising. What if they just dont want to do the surgery at all, for fear of being sued? then they could say, "Well you're a smoker... uh... sorry" , or they know that operating on little young and sick Johnny (5 spots down the waiting list) will look good in the papers... etc....
by choosing the latter you give doctors the choice whom to treat, and some will no doubt abuse it.
Even by charging a fee, i don't think will remedy this.
IMO there is no in between. either free for all, or a system like the US has.
|