 |
|
|
|
 |
Mr.Mystery
Static Guru

Registered: Dec 2001
Location: Vantaa
|
|
|
Aug-14-2006 15:58
|
|
|
 |
 |
Sand Leaper
Tension hunter

Registered: Jul 2001
Location: Oslo, Norway
|
|
|
Aug-14-2006 16:02
|
|
|
 |
 |
SYSTEM-J
IDKFA.

Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Manchester
|
|
|
Aug-14-2006 16:10
|
|
|
 |
 |
Sand Leaper
Tension hunter

Registered: Jul 2001
Location: Oslo, Norway
|
|
|
Aug-14-2006 16:23
|
|
|
 |
 |
Sand Leaper
Tension hunter

Registered: Jul 2001
Location: Oslo, Norway
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by DJ RJT
Exactly.
The problems that arrise for me come from when DJ's or Producers label themselves as "Techno" DJ's/producers. It's essentially become a meaningless term to me, as whenever I read about someone's new "techno" mix or track it could mean anything from Minimal or Tech House to bangin' Tech Trance.
It just confuses me. |
You can easily say the same about the recent "electro" trend. Or for that matter, the problem that was around 4-5 years ago, when techno automatically meant banging out 20-30 loop/tool techno tracks in an hour. Today, the problem is the same, only the loop/tool techno tracks are replaced by "minimal". And "minimal" (a la Gabriel Ananda or Dominik Eulberg) has close to nothing in common with the original idea of minimal shaped by people like Robert Hood etc. etc.
It's an endless list of dilemmas really, but as long as you listen to enough and get that "feel" of things, you'll realize how to keep track of things after a while.
___________________
"Wenn du dich zum Untergrund zählst, reicht es nicht, es nur zu sagen. Du musst auch viel graben, um es zu werden."
|
|
Aug-14-2006 16:42
|
|
|
 |
 |
RJT
last minute disco

Registered: Oct 2004
Location:
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Sand Leaper
You can easily say the same about the recent "electro" trend. Or for that matter, the problem that was around 4-5 years ago, when techno automatically meant banging out 20-30 loop/tool techno tracks in an hour. Today, the problem is the same, only the loop/tool techno tracks are replaced by "minimal". And "minimal" (a la Gabriel Ananda or Dominik Eulberg) has close to nothing in common with the original idea of minimal shaped by people like Robert Hood etc. etc.
It's an endless list of dilemmas really, but as long as you listen to enough and get that "feel" of things, you'll realize how to keep track of things after a while. |
You make a great point, because honestly, if I tell a lot of people I play "house" music, and then they hear me play, I'll get all sorts of responses that run the gamut of:
"This isn't House! It's Techno (or minimal)!"
to
"This isn't House! It's Trance!"
I guess because I have my own set definitions of what "house," "trance," "electro," etc. are to me, I don't see the dilemmas as readily, but with the word "Techno" I just immediately feel lost.
It's rare when a thread on TA actually makes me think about the music in a different way, thanks for the well thought out responses Leaper!

___________________
last minute disco dot net
|
|
Aug-14-2006 16:53
|
|
|
 |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 20:15.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|