Become a part of the TranceAddict community!Frequently Asked Questions - Please read this if you haven'tSearch the forums
TranceAddict Forums > Main Forums > Music Discussion > Paul Oakenfold - Not Over
Pages (3): [1] 2 3 »   Last Thread   Next Thread
Share
Author
Thread    Post A Reply
DJ Legs
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Feb 2006
Location: New Hampshire
Paul Oakenfold - Not Over

Heard this on Sirius, Awsome track IMHO. Better than the Original from Grace. Anyone Fimiliar with the track? I bet it sounds awsome in the club.

Old Post Oct-24-2006 16:10  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for DJ Legs Click here to Send DJ Legs a Private Message Add DJ Legs to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
montana
dub come save me



Registered: Mar 2003
Location: södertälje. sweden

it's horrible & redudant. Oakenfold butchers His & Steve Osbourne (heavy emphasis on osbourne)'s classic.


___________________
facebook | blog | scrobbler | setarchive | 20160316
"I believe that's referred to as intelligent drum & bass, which obviously means there's a genre of stupid drum & bass out there" (John Peel)

Old Post Oct-24-2006 16:11  Syria
Click Here to See the Profile for montana Click here to Send montana a Private Message Visit montana's homepage! Add montana to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
DJ Legs
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Feb 2006
Location: New Hampshire

Are you talking about the track itself? There are 2 Mixes from Oakenfold that I know of... And of course, Thats your Opinion. I happen to really enjoy the track.

Old Post Oct-24-2006 16:15  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for DJ Legs Click here to Send DJ Legs a Private Message Add DJ Legs to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
montana
dub come save me



Registered: Mar 2003
Location: södertälje. sweden

Grace = Paul Oakenfold, Steve Osbourne & Dominique Atkins

Osbourne & Oakenfold produced the original Not Over Yet in 1993 with Dominique Atkins on vocals

1995 came BT Mixes

1999 came the Breeder Mixes (and also some shit remixes by Anthony Acid & DJ Skribble)

2006 came Oakenfold's Remake. it's horrible, it's redudant. and it's just yet another sign thtat oakenfold is just a washed up, out-of-ideas, talantless monkey


___________________
facebook | blog | scrobbler | setarchive | 20160316
"I believe that's referred to as intelligent drum & bass, which obviously means there's a genre of stupid drum & bass out there" (John Peel)

Old Post Oct-24-2006 16:20  Syria
Click Here to See the Profile for montana Click here to Send montana a Private Message Visit montana's homepage! Add montana to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Sykonee
Supreme EMCritic



Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Vancouver, Canada

Sounds like something Anjunabeats would churn out.


___________________
Everyone has an opinion. Mine just happens to be a little more informed than most.
Electronic Music Critic: Near-Daily Ruminations Of Music I Own, In Alphabetical Order!

Old Post Oct-24-2006 16:23  Canada
Click Here to See the Profile for Sykonee Click here to Send Sykonee a Private Message Visit Sykonee's homepage! Add Sykonee to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
DJ Legs
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Feb 2006
Location: New Hampshire

Now see, The original from 1993 has Horrable Vocals i think. The Newer one is much Cleaner and Strait Forward IMHO Of Course... Because a DJ Mixes a Tune doesnt neccesaraly mean he is out of ideas, maybe he thought he could better the song?

Old Post Oct-24-2006 16:27  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for DJ Legs Click here to Send DJ Legs a Private Message Add DJ Legs to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
montana
dub come save me



Registered: Mar 2003
Location: södertälje. sweden

quote:
Originally posted by DJ Legs
Now see, The original from 1993 has Horrable Vocals i think. The Newer one is much Cleaner and Strait Forward IMHO Of Course... Because a DJ Mixes a Tune doesnt neccesaraly mean he is out of ideas, maybe he thought he could better the song?


you must be joking


___________________
facebook | blog | scrobbler | setarchive | 20160316
"I believe that's referred to as intelligent drum & bass, which obviously means there's a genre of stupid drum & bass out there" (John Peel)

Old Post Oct-24-2006 16:35  Syria
Click Here to See the Profile for montana Click here to Send montana a Private Message Visit montana's homepage! Add montana to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
JakeC
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Mar 2005
Location: Birmingham

quote:
Originally posted by DJ Legs
Now see, The original from 1993 has Horrable Vocals i think. The Newer one is much Cleaner and Strait Forward IMHO Of Course... Because a DJ Mixes a Tune doesnt neccesaraly mean he is out of ideas, maybe he thought he could better the song?


He tried to better CJ Bolland - The Prophet on his last album. I loled.

Old Post Oct-24-2006 16:35  England
Click Here to See the Profile for JakeC Click here to Send JakeC a Private Message Visit JakeC's homepage! Add JakeC to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
SMC
custom title addict



Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Sweden

I like the new vocals and the new lyrics, the melodies and the production aren't that exciting, so overall it's a decent tune i would say.

Old Post Oct-24-2006 16:36 
Click Here to See the Profile for SMC Click here to Send SMC a Private Message Add SMC to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
waxHead
I Kill Love.



Registered: Jul 2003
Location: U.S.

"Paul Oakenfold - Not Over" ?

More like "Paul Oakenfold - DEFINITELY Over"

He should take his money and retire quietly, rather than embarrass himself with pathetic mixing and awful remixes of classic tunes.


___________________
Discogs: FOR SALE!

Old Post Oct-24-2006 16:40  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for waxHead Click here to Send waxHead a Private Message Add waxHead to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
SkooB_E
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Apr 2004
Location: Sweden

I don't think those two songs should even be compared. This is so different from the old one it's a totally new song.

Old Post Oct-24-2006 16:47  Serbia
Click Here to See the Profile for SkooB_E Click here to Send SkooB_E a Private Message Add SkooB_E to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
miamitranceman
Extreme tranceaddict



Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Miami

quote:
Originally posted by SkooB_E
I don't think those two songs should even be compared. This is so different from the old one it's a totally new song.



I agree. Although I do like the updated version.


___________________
Click the link below to stream all of my mixes past and present. New mixes go up about once a month. Enjoy!

www.mixcloud.com/jluger

Old Post Oct-24-2006 20:41  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for miamitranceman Click here to Send miamitranceman a Private Message Add miamitranceman to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message

TranceAddict Forums > Main Forums > Music Discussion > Paul Oakenfold - Not Over
Post New Thread    Post A Reply

Pages (3): [1] 2 3 »  
Last Thread   Next Thread
Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackPlease help! Song ID ??? [2003] [0]

Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackGroove Coverage - "The End" [2003]

Show Printable Version | Subscribe to this Thread
Forum Jump:

All times are GMT. The time now is 01:21.

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
 
Search this Thread:

 
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict

Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
Support TA!