 |
|
|
|
 |
Nickerous
Junior tranceaddict
Registered: Sep 2006
Location: Washington D.C.
|
|
|
I do that a lot. I think it all boils down to how much you connect with the song you are working on. A song worth finishing is something that connects with you beyond the point of it being "catchy."
|
|
Oct-31-2006 01:00
|
|
|
 |
 |
rounser
tranceaddict in training
Registered: Oct 2006
Location:
|
|
|
Here's a trick to get you thinking in terms of arrangement from before you've entered a single event:
In your sequencer, set aside about 32 blank phrases (1 phrase = 32 kicks). You now have the length of your track; anything you create has to go in one of these phrases.
The nice psychological trick here is that your brain realises that you no longer have infinite space to fill in, only that amount is available to "tell your story". Once you fill a phrase, try and imagine and work on the phrase that occurs before it, and the one after it. This should help kick you out of only thinking in loops.
Last edited by rounser on Oct-31-2006 at 11:14
|
|
Oct-31-2006 11:05
|
|
|
 |
 |
zodiac9
Supreme tranceaddict

Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Houston, TX
|
|
|
Sometimes you just have to discipline yourself to finish a track. Seems to me, people that can't finish a track lack motivation for some reason. Think about this, if you were getting paid a good sum of money for a track, could you finish it? The answer is most likely, yes. So the ability to finish tracks is in you somewhere, you probably just lack the motivation. Sidestep that lack of mostivation by forcing yourself to finish one track, it will get easier after that.
The problem is, forcing yourself to do anything can feel like work, and that's where the fun ends for a lot of people, so they quit. You have to just get through that part, then you'll see the rewards. Serious producing requires a lot of dedication. The more songs you finish, the easier it gets. Your arrangement skills increase with ever track you finish.
___________________
soundcloud
Youtube
|
|
Oct-31-2006 23:53
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
rounser
tranceaddict in training
Registered: Oct 2006
Location:
|
|
|
| quote: | | hehe, 1 phrase = 16 kicks |
Yes and no. We're both right according to wikipedia:
| quote: | | In common practice phrases are often four and most often eight bars, or measures, long. |
In any case, I'm certain from DJing that in the vast majority of cases dance music makes significant changes every 32 kicks:
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 [ready to throw new record in]
[throw!]1...
It's possible to throw on the 16th kick, but then builds and fills usually don't match.
| quote: | anyways, i do this when i write tracks. i'll sit there with a loop of maybe 8 - 16 bars (depends what the melody/bassline is) and just add midi
add midi
add midi
add midi
until i'm at like 15-20 sounds and then just stretch it all out in arrangement view. |
That's another good approach, perhaps superior to the one I suggested. It sounds a bit like the "mute programming" method used by the Neptunes, where they have all riffs running all the time and just add and subtract mutes to arrange the track.
Last edited by rounser on Nov-01-2006 at 10:14
|
|
Nov-01-2006 09:57
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 04:21.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|