|
| quote: | Originally posted by PSi
they are genre mixing, using tracks that would regularely be played by big name house and breakbeat dj's. |
You're totally right there PSi. Back in the good old days (EEK! I'm starting to sound like an old man!) it was relatively easy to pigeon hole a track by genre. These days it's becoming increasingly difficult to say "that's Trance" or "that's House." The lines between what genre a track actually is has become incredibly blurred. Here is an example. Take DJ Tiesto - Flight 643. Going by the formula of '98/'99 Trance then you couldn't call this a trance track, it doesn't have a extensively large breakdown and the main melody continues for about 70% of the track. However for all realistic purposes, this is a trance track.
The reason this is happening isn't with finding "the next big thing." Well I lie, with some less respectable DJ's who's names won't be mentioned it is, but in the main stay it's just an effort to fight becoming stale. Think about this, if every club in the country had classic '98/'99 trance spinning and nothing else, despite the fact that it would be really great at first, we'd soon tire of it and the classics would no longer be classics, they'd get over played and ruined. People naturally crave new material and something that's different.
Also, with the ‘98/’99 trance, producers were seeing what an impact these really euphoric/epic tracks were making and blatantly copying each other. Tunes were becoming formulaic; a large proportion of trance was no longer trance by feeling but trance by numbers. On top of this the money grabbing goons who run the commercial side of the music industry cashed in on the success of these tunes and it all became way too commercial, something that I feel we are still suffering from today.
Last edited by Spin Doctor on Mar-25-2002 at 01:44
|