|
FYI, you can't rewire Torq into Ableton if you are running with full timecode vinyl control, so that's not really an option, nor does it make sense (why would you do it? Torq has a sampler for launching clips anyway). Anywho... you are considering SSL.
I've actually got:
2 CDJ-1000's
2 Technics 1200's
1 Xone 92
1 Macbook
1 Torq (Serato like thing)
So I understand your dilema. I actually bought Torq just to get some more use out of my 1200's. It's really fun to spin with, but at the end of the day I still use my CDJ-1000's for recording demos and serious things. The advantage with the CDJ's is that they are so damn accurate. Don't forget, however, that you can use Serato/Torq/etc. with CDJ's as well as 1200's.
I only spin out occasionally, but when I've done so I've brought CD's. Walking into a club with a laptop, SSL, etc. will tend to make the technical people cringe. I mean lots of people do it, but there's just a lot of things that can go wrong. And if you have to play before or after someone else, it can get complicated.
What is it about the CDJ-200's that you really don't like? Are you doing turntablism type things?
Also, if you are willing to bring: A macbook, SSL interface, timecode vinyl, cables, etc... would you be willing to bring your own CDJ-1000's to the club? That's another option.
| quote: | Originally posted by nrjizer
I meant to say UNbalancing, heh.
Yeah, but I could easily continue to burn my music to CD, and just take CDs to gigs that do have proper CD decks.
And I DO have the desire to do more with a laptop than mix 2 tracks back to back--in fact, that's why I bought the damn thing to begin with. Hawtin has to carry two laptops to his gigs--one with Serato, one with Ableton. Of course, he gets paid obscene amounts of money.
The thing is, if CDJ-1000/800s were as standard and commonplace as Technics 1200s, then I'd be perfectly content, and this thread wouldn't exist. |
|