 |
|
|
|
 |
wrzonance
Moon

Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by jacheatamobits
open source only goes so far, IMO |
Yea, open source is kinda like Star Trek. We dream of these utopian societies where everyone is driven to create and make for their own sakes. But it just doesn't happen.
Open source can totally kick ass, because there can be some creative people behind a free project. But sometimes it may be two or three guys, and more often, just one dude compiling some code.
When it's commercial you have a whole TEAM of programmers and developers. And you have MONEY behind them to motivate them to keep adding features and fixing bugs.
The problem is... you have to pay them. Shame huh?
Anyway, I've probably blabbed enough about this, but I have legally obtained both Pro Tools and Cubase 4, and have extensive knowledge with all other kinds of DAWs (including Reason ).
And I have to say, Pro Tools is spot on for recording, editing and MIXING music, but it is lacking in workflow "friendliness" when it comes to MIDI. Cubase is fantastic for MIDI based production.
To each his own really. But the combo I'm enjoying right now, legally, is Reason rewired into Cubase to write the music, and Pro Tools to mix my music.
It's good times.
---Adam
___________________
Soundcloud
|
|
Feb-06-2007 06:52
|
|
|
 |
 |
TheChuckster
Junior tranceaddict
Registered: Sep 2004
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
|
|
|
LMMS is beginning to shape up as a Fruity Loops clone. It's still unstable though and doesn't have many features (no effects, etc.).
|
|
Feb-07-2007 02:25
|
|
|
 |
 |
Diginerd
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Stamford, CT, USA but from the UK
|
|
|
Ardour is a really good DAW, though some hurdles if you want VST support, Rosegarden is a reasonable cubase clone. That's cubase from a while ago, not SX4!
|
|
Feb-07-2007 03:07
|
|
|
 |
 |
TheChuckster
Junior tranceaddict
Registered: Sep 2004
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
|
|
|
Right. Linux is very lacking in certain areas. You can't blame the developers either because they aren't getting paid. I've done some open source development myself, and I've gotten floods of e-mails from people asking for feature X. I just don't have time.
But back on subject, without corporate support, the audio drivers will continue to be lacking. Often, a coder is satisfied if they hear sound coming out from the speakers. They just aren't motivated to add support for every little thing such as the rarely used the front panel MIDI auxiliary input adapter. Plus, while coding can be fun, who likes to debug? There's plenty of unstable Linux software that people use, simply because that's all there is.
Without the companies backing open source development, that means someone has to write a driver in their bedroom on their own time without any documentation or support. That means adding simple features means lots of extra reverse engineering.
|
|
Feb-07-2007 03:12
|
|
|
 |
 |
HaZZa
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Mar 2001
Location: Holland
|
|
|
Feb-07-2007 20:45
|
|
|
 |
 |
wayfinder
Supreme tranceaddict

Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Berlin
|
|
|
Feb-10-2007 07:46
|
|
|
 |
 |
thecYrus
Supreme tranceaddict

Registered: Oct 2002
Location:
|
|
|
Feb-10-2007 07:58
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:04.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|