 |
|
|
|
 |
basd
progression

Registered: Jul 2002
Location: Somewhere nowhere
|
|
|
Mar-07-2007 13:57
|
|
|
 |
 |
ClearWater
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Sep 2006
Location:
|
|
|
Re: Re: VOCALS and TRANCE these days
| quote: | Originally posted by kr00t0n
Dude, trance stopped being 'hypnotic' years ago, with or without vocals.
You want more hypnotic stuff, buy some goa/psy, trance is just not like that any more. |
yup
|
|
Mar-07-2007 15:06
|
|
|
 |
 |
SMC
custom title addict
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Sweden
|
|
|
Yeah, it seems like everyone has to do a new CH00N with anita kelsey, justine suissa etc. I don't think all vocal tracks are shit, but so many of them are just cheesy and dull with meaningless lyrics and forgettable music. I find that many times the vocals have a central role in the song but there is no interesting relation between the vocals and all the rest. It's like here we have some vocals, we do a track, everything is in key, here are some fitting chords, she has a beautiful voice, that's it, but there is no real interplay between the vocals and the music so the result is just insipid, like if the vocals were just dumped on top of an existing track. Ironically there are examples of much better results being achieved by throwing an acapella on top of an unrelated track.
However, there is so much great music, great trance, with and without vocals, so we should concentrate on the good stuff.
You mentioned the king, MWNN, so why not Paint A Picture or Seratonin Sunrise. 
Concerning psytrance, just like in all genres there are, and there has always been, loads of crap and loads of great music.
|
|
Mar-07-2007 17:20
|
|
|
 |
 |
ClearWater
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Sep 2006
Location:
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by SMC
It's like here we have some vocals, we do a track, everything is in key, here are some fitting chords, she has a beautiful voice, that's it, but there is no real interplay between the vocals and the music so the result is just insipid, like if the vocals were just dumped on top of an existing track. Ironically there are examples of much better results being achieved by throwing an acapella on top of an unrelated track. |
Yea, I agree with what you are saying, adding the vocal doesn't REALLY add anything to the music other than make it more accessible to mainstream folks.
As far as interplay, you got any examples of tracks that do what you're talking about? I'm not quite sure what you mean.
|
|
Mar-07-2007 19:51
|
|
|
 |
 |
Soeder
Supreme tranceaddict

Registered: Apr 2004
Location: Oslo, Norway
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by SMC
Yeah, it seems like everyone has to do a new CH00N with anita kelsey, justine suissa etc. I don't think all vocal tracks are shit, but so many of them are just cheesy and dull with meaningless lyrics and forgettable music. I find that many times the vocals have a central role in the song but there is no interesting relation between the vocals and all the rest. It's like here we have some vocals, we do a track, everything is in key, here are some fitting chords, she has a beautiful voice, that's it, but there is no real interplay between the vocals and the music so the result is just insipid, like if the vocals were just dumped on top of an existing track. Ironically there are examples of much better results being achieved by throwing an acapella on top of an unrelated track.
|
Indeed. I've always claimed that if you're gonna make a vocal track, create the vocal first and build the tune around it, not otherwise. Justine Suissa has a sweet voice and i think it's disrespectfull to throw it in tunes like Armin - Simple things (It's actually worse than Milk inc.)
___________________
Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
|
|
Mar-07-2007 20:53
|
|
|
 |
 |
SMC
custom title addict
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Sweden
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by ClearVision
As far as interplay, you got any examples of tracks that do what you're talking about? I'm not quite sure what you mean. |
Perhaps it's not the appropriate word, what i'm refering to is quite subtle and not really an objective property. The notion that the instruments and the vocals together make up a whole, the instruments leave room for the vocals and the vocals leave room for the instruments. The contrary is when instruments, vocals or both are too "big" in relation each other. However, there is room for opinions about this. Maybe this is only important to me because of my personal taste and the way i interpret music.
| quote: | Originally posted by Soeder
Indeed. I've always claimed that if you're gonna make a vocal track, create the vocal first and build the tune around it, not otherwise. |
I don't doubt that many artists actually do that. But it can still end up sounding like they've done the other way around because it's not to be taken for granted that the track turns out to be more than decent just because a good procedure has been followed, there is so much more to writing music. That's why a remix that utilizes existing vocals can be much better than an original work, because the important things are the musical ideas.
Last edited by SMC on Mar-07-2007 at 21:10
|
|
Mar-07-2007 21:00
|
|
|
 |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 19:16.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|