Become a part of the TranceAddict community!Frequently Asked Questions - Please read this if you haven'tSearch the forums
TranceAddict Forums > DJing / Production / Promotion > DJ Booth > Recording mixes - M-Audio Delta 44
  Last Thread   Next Thread
Share
Author
Thread    Post A Reply
agentdansmith
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Cannock, UK
Recording mixes - M-Audio Delta 44

My new M-Audio Delta 44 soundcard supports 24bit/96Khz recording. Should I record my mixes at this quality and then convert it to 16bit/44Khz for audio cd's or should I just record at 44Khz in the first place?

Cheers

Old Post Apr-23-2007 13:05  United Kingdom
Click Here to See the Profile for agentdansmith Click here to Send agentdansmith a Private Message Visit agentdansmith's homepage! Add agentdansmith to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
agentdansmith
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Cannock, UK

Anyone?

Old Post Apr-24-2007 08:28  United Kingdom
Click Here to See the Profile for agentdansmith Click here to Send agentdansmith a Private Message Visit agentdansmith's homepage! Add agentdansmith to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
OMNIFEX
Senior tranceaddict



Registered: Sep 2004
Location: Columbia University, NYC

It depends on what you are going to do.

If you are just recording your mixes, add markers to the files and, throw them on a CD, you don't need to go through the trouble of recording @ 96 Khz.

If you are planning to add effects (EQing, compression, etc.) at the final stage (Mastering), then it would be better to record at a higher sample rate and, downsample when it's ready to go on a CD.

If you choose to record at a higher sample rate, you may be better off recording at 88.2 Khz instead. I've heard it is better when downsampling to 44.1 Khz than 96 Khz.

Play around with it, and see what sounds best to you.


___________________
OMNIFEX

Old Post Apr-24-2007 22:43  Jamaica
Click Here to See the Profile for OMNIFEX Click here to Send OMNIFEX a Private Message Add OMNIFEX to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
agentdansmith
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Cannock, UK

quote:
Originally posted by OMNIFEX
It depends on what you are going to do.

If you are just recording your mixes, add markers to the files and, throw them on a CD, you don't need to go through the trouble of recording @ 96 Khz.

If you are planning to add effects (EQing, compression, etc.) at the final stage (Mastering), then it would be better to record at a higher sample rate and, downsample when it's ready to go on a CD.

If you choose to record at a higher sample rate, you may be better off recording at 88.2 Khz instead. I've heard it is better when downsampling to 44.1 Khz than 96 Khz.

Play around with it, and see what sounds best to you.


Nice one, cheers

Old Post Apr-25-2007 08:20  United Kingdom
Click Here to See the Profile for agentdansmith Click here to Send agentdansmith a Private Message Visit agentdansmith's homepage! Add agentdansmith to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message

TranceAddict Forums > DJing / Production / Promotion > DJ Booth > Recording mixes - M-Audio Delta 44
Post New Thread    Post A Reply

 
Last Thread   Next Thread
Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbacktrack i.d. #3 [2005] [0]

Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackWay Out West vs Love Tattoo - "Intensify Some Drums" [2004]

Show Printable Version | Subscribe to this Thread
Forum Jump:

All times are GMT. The time now is 13:11.

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
 
Search this Thread:

 
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict

Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
Support TA!