Become a part of the TranceAddict community!Frequently Asked Questions - Please read this if you haven'tSearch the forums
TranceAddict Forums > Local Scene Info / Discussion / EDM Event Listings > Canada > Canada - Toronto & Southern Ont. > Ecstasy Less Dangerous Than Alcohol
Pages (5): [1] 2 3 4 5 »   Last Thread   Next Thread
Share
Author
Thread    Post A Reply
Revival160
Senior tranceaddict



Registered: Jul 2006
Location: In the weeds
Ecstasy Less Dangerous Than Alcohol

Wow - this new British study places ecstasy at the bottom of the 'dangerous drugs list', and lists both alcohol and tobacco as more dangerous. Maybe it's time to update our laws?

Source: http://abcnews.go.com/International...=2975214&page=1

quote:


By MARIA CHENG AP Medical Writer

LONDON Mar 23, 2007 (AP)— New "landmark" research finds that alcohol and tobacco are more dangerous than some illegal drugs like marijuana or Ecstasy and should be classified as such in legal systems, according to a new British study.

In research published Friday in The Lancet magazine, Professor David Nutt of Britain's Bristol University and colleagues proposed a new framework for the classification of harmful substances, based on the actual risks posed to society. Their ranking listed alcohol and tobacco among the top 10 most dangerous substances.

Nutt and colleagues used three factors to determine the harm associated with any drug: the physical harm to the user, the drug's potential for addiction, and the impact on society of drug use. The researchers asked two groups of experts psychiatrists specializing in addiction and legal or police officials with scientific or medical expertise to assign scores to 20 different drugs, including heroin, cocaine, Ecstasy, amphetamines, and LSD.

Nutt and his colleagues then calculated the drugs' overall rankings. In the end, the experts agreed with each other but not with the existing British classification of dangerous substances.

Heroin and cocaine were ranked most dangerous, followed by barbiturates and street methadone. Alcohol was the fifth-most harmful drug and tobacco the ninth most harmful. Cannabis came in 11th, and near the bottom of the list was Ecstasy.

According to existing British and U.S. drug policy, alcohol and tobacco are legal, while cannabis and Ecstasy are both illegal. Previous reports, including a study from a parliamentary committee last year, have questioned the scientific rationale for Britain's drug classification system.

"The current drug system is ill thought-out and arbitrary," said Nutt, referring to the United Kingdom's practice of assigning drugs to three distinct divisions, ostensibly based on the drugs' potential for harm. "The exclusion of alcohol and tobacco from the Misuse of Drugs Act is, from a scientific perspective, arbitrary," write Nutt and his colleagues in The Lancet.

Tobacco causes 40 percent of all hospital illnesses, while alcohol is blamed for more than half of all visits to hospital emergency rooms. The substances also harm society in other ways, damaging families and occupying police services.

Nutt hopes that the research will provoke debate within the UK and beyond about how drugs including socially acceptable drugs such as alcohol should be regulated. While different countries use different markers to classify dangerous drugs, none use a system like the one proposed by Nutt's study, which he hopes could serve as a framework for international authorities.

"This is a landmark paper," said Dr. Leslie Iversen, professor of pharmacology at Oxford University. Iversen was not connected to the research. "It is the first real step towards an evidence-based classification of drugs." He added that based on the paper's results, alcohol and tobacco could not reasonably be excluded.

"The rankings also suggest the need for better regulation of the more harmful drugs that are currently legal, i.e. tobacco and alcohol," wrote Wayne Hall, of the University of Queensland in Brisbane, Australia, in an accompanying Lancet commentary. Hall was not involved with Nutt's paper.

While experts agreed that criminalizing alcohol and tobacco would be challenging, they said that governments should review the penalties imposed for drug abuse and try to make them more reflective of the actual risks and damages involved.

Nutt called for more education so that people were aware of the risks of various drugs. "All drugs are dangerous," he said. "Even the ones people know and love and use every day."


Copyright 2007 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


___________________
Just concentrate, and try some music

Old Post Mar-23-2007 15:51  Canada
Click Here to See the Profile for Revival160 Click here to Send Revival160 a Private Message Add Revival160 to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Batman84
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Apr 2006
Location:

definitly time, i mean based on that Peter Jennings report that im sure we have all seen, the first research released on the harmful effects of MDMA were all falsified. its time to get a real study going and possibly the de-criminalization of MDMA, unless there is hard evidence that there are adverse effects on the brain, nerve system etc.

i mean, i wouldnt mind getting perscription MDMA...

Old Post Mar-23-2007 15:59  Canada
Click Here to See the Profile for Batman84 Click here to Send Batman84 a Private Message Add Batman84 to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
*~LiSa-LoO~*
Ferry Corsten's bitch



Registered: Mar 2003
Location: on holiday

Personally I think that one of the main reasons they're not legalizing ecstasy is because they can't control it's production and distribution whereas alcohol and tobacco they can.


___________________
Shut up and DANCE!!
House moves my body, Trance owns my soul, Progressive drives me wild

Old Post Mar-23-2007 16:00  Canada
Click Here to See the Profile for *~LiSa-LoO~* Click here to Send *~LiSa-LoO~* a Private Message Add *~LiSa-LoO~* to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Batman84
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Apr 2006
Location:

exactly, its too hard for them to tax it so forget it.

pricks.

Old Post Mar-23-2007 16:04  Canada
Click Here to See the Profile for Batman84 Click here to Send Batman84 a Private Message Add Batman84 to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Revival160
Senior tranceaddict



Registered: Jul 2006
Location: In the weeds

quote:
Originally posted by *~LiSa-LoO~*
Personally I think that one of the main reasons they're not legalizing ecstasy is because they can't control it's production and distribution whereas alcohol and tobacco they can.


Of course it is. Legalization of it would mean putting it under some sort of government control and then taxing it. It would be safer, but the price would probably go up.

The real problem really would be having the government reverse their long standing stance on illegal drugs. Look at how long it has taken for pot to get to it's vague status in Ontario. Decriminilization of marijuana will be the first step in the right direction.

In any case, we're years and years away from any reforms. Probably too far in the future for any of us to enjoy...


___________________
Just concentrate, and try some music

Old Post Mar-23-2007 16:06  Canada
Click Here to See the Profile for Revival160 Click here to Send Revival160 a Private Message Add Revival160 to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Time2Burn
TOTA Beacon



Registered: Mar 2001
Location:

The real fact of the matter is no matter what a study will prove nothing will change. Multi-billion dollar corporations make too much money on alcohol and tobacco. DO think they actually care about the actual risks they pose? Why do you think other drugs became illegal inthe first place?

Old Post Mar-23-2007 16:44  South Africa
Click Here to See the Profile for Time2Burn Click here to Send Time2Burn a Private Message Add Time2Burn to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
rabbitjoker
aural sadist



Registered: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto, ON, CANADA

What you people are missing is that it is still on a list of dangerous substances!

Just because a legal one is high on the list doesn't mean we should start legalizing all those below it.


___________________
- rabbit.joker [funny¿rabbit] | www.rabbitjoker.com |www.ddtt.org

Dark Dirty Tech Tribal. | Hands in air (trance) and feet on the floor (house).

Old Post Mar-23-2007 16:51  Canada
Click Here to See the Profile for rabbitjoker Click here to Send rabbitjoker a Private Message Visit rabbitjoker's homepage! Add rabbitjoker to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
infinity HiGH
groovin



Registered: Oct 2001
Location: west side T.O

quote:
Originally posted by rabbitjoker
Just because a legal one is high on the list doesn't mean we should start legalizing all those below it.


I disagree. It's very hypocritical to allow one drug, that's more dangerous, to be sold to people, and not the ones below it.

Then again, capitalism is full of hypocrisies.

Old Post Mar-23-2007 16:58  Poland
Click Here to See the Profile for infinity HiGH Click here to Send infinity HiGH a Private Message Add infinity HiGH to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
I_Am_Vince
aka Invasionmix



Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Mississauga, ON

If you guys seen the video 'If drugs were legal' they argued that if any of the drugs were to be legalized that the government would control the distribution and produce it themselves, so in the case of E you would get a standardized same potent high every time you buy it. They also said the cost of it would probably drop, cause the price of illegal substances are high because of the risk that's involved with producing it and distributing it among the market.

Old Post Mar-23-2007 17:09  Canada
Click Here to See the Profile for I_Am_Vince Click here to Send I_Am_Vince a Private Message Add I_Am_Vince to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
rabbitjoker
aural sadist



Registered: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto, ON, CANADA

quote:
Originally posted by infinity HiGH
I disagree. It's very hypocritical to allow one drug, that's more dangerous, to be sold to people, and not the ones below it.


We're not arguing hypocrisy. We're arguing whether dangerous illegal substances should be legalized because more dangerous legal substances exist.

The answer is no - we should not be legalizing things that are dangerous regardless of what "more dangerous" legal things already are available.


___________________
- rabbit.joker [funny¿rabbit] | www.rabbitjoker.com |www.ddtt.org

Dark Dirty Tech Tribal. | Hands in air (trance) and feet on the floor (house).

Old Post Mar-23-2007 17:31  Canada
Click Here to See the Profile for rabbitjoker Click here to Send rabbitjoker a Private Message Visit rabbitjoker's homepage! Add rabbitjoker to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
_EuG_
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Jun 2006
Location: toronto

I hate to do this but

http://www.tranceaddict.com/forums/...Dangerous+drugs

Old Post Mar-23-2007 17:40  Canada
Click Here to See the Profile for _EuG_ Click here to Send _EuG_ a Private Message Add _EuG_ to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
PurpleHaze
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Nov 2006
Location: leaning against the speaker stack

No new news here. Although I enjoyed reading it thoroughly. It's been a while confirmed that the relative risk/addiction/impact on society of mdma is not as great as people had thought before hand.

It's great they're finally puplishing their studies and showing the public that "ecstacy" is not just a crazy drug ppl use to get FUCKED up at clubs etc. Indeed mdma was actually prescribed back in the day to psychotic patients I believe?

Like said in that documentary on youtube "Ecstacy is the only drug that has MANY happy users, and hardly any unhappy users" the difference separating the two immensly.

As with all the fine things in life, mdma is a delicacy and should be used in moderate amounts on special occasions to enjoy it the most

Old Post Mar-23-2007 17:45  Romania
Click Here to See the Profile for PurpleHaze Click here to Send PurpleHaze a Private Message Add PurpleHaze to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message

TranceAddict Forums > Local Scene Info / Discussion / EDM Event Listings > Canada > Canada - Toronto & Southern Ont. > Ecstasy Less Dangerous Than Alcohol
Post New Thread    Post A Reply

Pages (5): [1] 2 3 4 5 »  
Last Thread   Next Thread
Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackName That Tune! [2010] [1]

Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackPF Project - "Choose Life (Tour de Force Remix)" [2003]

Show Printable Version | Subscribe to this Thread
Forum Jump:

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:12.

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
 
Search this Thread:

 
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict

Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
Support TA!