There currently isn't a law in Britain to prosecute politicians who deceive the public. In my opinion this means that our votes are essentially worthless because politicians can do whatever they want for four years without having to face any consequences for their actions - the present political system of Britain does not constitute a working democracy. Any thoughts?
Mar-19-2007 13:23
ResonantDrag
BeanAddict
Registered: Mar 2001
Location: just visiting
welcome to our world
Mar-19-2007 18:27
Fir3start3r
Armin Acolyte
Registered: Oct 2001
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
..and ours.
We simply vote them out of office and hopefully, with total lack of votes, the party gets disbanded.
___________________
"...End? No, the journey doesn't end here. Death is just another path...one that we all must take.
The grey rain-curtain of this world rolls back, and all change to silver glass...and then you see it...
...white shores...and beyond...the far green country under a swift sunrise."
Mar-19-2007 19:04
spiflicated
tranceaddict
Registered: Mar 2007
Location: California
Since when have subjects in the UK ever thought they lived in a democracy?
Mar-20-2007 02:21
Lilith
Meowsies!
Registered: Nov 2000
Location: Maximum Security twilight home for cats
quote:
Originally posted by spiflicated
Since when have subjects in the UK ever thought they lived in a democracy?
Very few in the US seem to be questioning that lately as well... 'Patriot act'
Aside from that, the UK has old impeachment laws which apply to parliament, while they might be old, are still laws.
Mar-20-2007 02:32
junebug
tranceaddict in training
Registered: Mar 2007
Location: London
Well, the reason why I'm all fired up about this at the minute is because my politics loving friend introduced me to the following website the other day:
They have created a law entitled the 'Misrepresentation of the People act'and they are currently seeking an MP who'll help them get it passed through parliament. They've interviewed lots of MPs (&even the Lord Chancellor!) and put up the footage on the site. Today they are discussing how there is a parliamentary 'Committee on Standards in Public Life' but that this committee is essentially controlled by the PM, so it isn't independent. Hmmm, what use is the vote if politicians can do whatever they like as soon as they are in power?
Mar-20-2007 10:02
Q5echo
asymetrical scepticism
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Dallas
quote:
Originally posted by Lilith
Very few in the US seem to be questioning that lately as well... 'Patriot act'
and it will remain the "very few" fortunately, until the majority feels it's no longer needed. yay democracy.
Mar-20-2007 11:29
junebug
tranceaddict in training
Registered: Mar 2007
Location: London
Apparently there is a 'Committee on Standards in Public Life' which is the main Parliamentary watchdog for ethics, standards etc. in Parliament. However, the committee reports and makes recommendations to the PM, he then decides whether to act upon them! Not exactly independent policing of parliament, is it?
Mar-21-2007 10:31
junebug
tranceaddict in training
Registered: Mar 2007
Location: London
By the way, if anyone is interested in discussing this issue I've posted on the beginners guide section of the website. Not had any luck yet, but would appreciate any contributions!
Mar-22-2007 11:48
junebug
tranceaddict in training
Registered: Mar 2007
Location: London
It is interesting that many people in Britain don't believe Tony Blair over Mahmoud Ahmadinejad when it comes to the capture of the Royal Navy guys 'n' gals...something to do with the government's track record?
Mar-26-2007 11:11
shaolin_Z
Hei Hu Quan
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Austin, Texas, USA: TXTA #102
quote:
Originally posted by Q5echo
and it will remain the "very few" fortunately, until the majority feels it's no longer needed. yay democracy.
We're supposed to be a Republic, not a Democracy.
___________________
"The Greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."-Stephen Hawking
"First they came for the communists, and I did not speak out— because I was not a communist;
Then they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out— because I was not a socialist;
Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out— because I was not a trade unionist;
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out— because I was not a Jew;
Then they came for me— and there was no one left to speak out for me." -Martin Niemöller
Apr-01-2007 03:07
Spirit5
Nobody
Registered: Jun 2005
Location:
quote:
Originally posted by shaolin_Z
We're supposed to be a Republic, not a Democracy.
Actually a "Republic" implies we are a "Representative Democracy" so we are still a democracy but not a direct democracy, meaning we elect people who are "supposed" to serve their constituients (though they serve special interests more than the people themselves). Who make laws for us. In some cases, we do vote on the laws being passed on local or state ballots like during primaries, but we don't actually make the laws (though we can petition congress to pass a law or create a bill for them to introduce). And that's a no brainer. And almost anyone is able to run for Congress or any office (look at what happened in California in I think 2002 during the election where Arnold got in).