Question for those who've recorded mixes on both a 62 and a DJM-8/400:

I own a DJM-400 but wanted something with a few more channels. I know the 62 is years-old in comparison, but will I be taking a hit in sound fidelity when I record mixes?

___________________

In terms of sound quality, xone > pioneer

___________________
Latest mix: Yohan - Full Spectrum (Fall 14 promo)
Like my stuff? Join my FB group here!

quote:

Originally posted by chinamon not true. i say "ugh" but i am a tranny.

quote:

Originally posted by kotsy lol colour me retarded

quote:

Originally posted by EvilTree In terms of sound quality, xone > pioneer

End of thread, really.

quote:

Originally posted by idoru End of thread, really.

In the words of Bill Paxton as Pvt. Hudson,

"Game over, man! Game over."

___________________

You wont be taking a hit you'll be upgrading in sound quality.

Unless you are using digital cables into CDJs from the 400. Then you have the digital/analog debate.

___________________
Click the link below to stream all of my mixes past and present. New mixes go up about once a month. Enjoy!

www.mixcloud.com/jluger

quote:

Originally posted by miamitranceman Unless you are using digital cables into CDJs from the 400. Then you have the digital/analog debate.

the djm400 doesn't have digital connections

quote:

Originally posted by nutsan the djm400 doesn't have digital connections

Oops yeah, meant the 800.

___________________
Click the link below to stream all of my mixes past and present. New mixes go up about once a month. Enjoy!

www.mixcloud.com/jluger

It depends what kind of music you want to play. If you're going for a proggy-house sound than go with the 62. If you wanna fool around with FXs and play trance go with the 400.