IMO yes, both male and female pornstars are really just prostituting themselves since they have sex for money...not that there's anything wrong with that

but what do you guys think? even tho they are involved in creating a product, there is still an exchange of money for sex so i don't think its wrong to think of it as a form of prostitution, except that it is filmed.

there are instances in which a couple will have sex on tape, IMO i wouldn't consider that prostitution, but if its a single male/female having sex with another male/female only for money, then i would consider it so.

quote:

Originally posted by AnotherWay83 IMO yes, both male and female pornstars are really just prostituting themselves since they have sex for money...not that there's anything wrong with that but what do you guys think? even tho they are involved in creating a product, there is still an exchange of money for sex so i don't think its wrong to think of it as a form of prostitution, except that it is filmed. there are instances in which a couple will have sex on tape, IMO i wouldn't consider that prostitution, but if its a single male/female having sex with another male/female only for money, then i would consider it so.

Agreed.

No.

Yesnomaybeso?

Last edited by idoru on Apr-16-2007 at 07:33

Porn stars are not fuckin' prostitutes. It's acting, you're being paid to act.


If kicking a ball down a field can be acting ( bend it like Beckham ), and dancing on a stage can be acting ( Center stage ) then why can't sex be acting? Just because there happens to be an illegal act that consists of the same motions so to say, doesn't mean you should compare the two to be the same.

A lot of male porn stars don't get paid, and as such, are just sluts.

___________________
Alcoholic Alliance
The Ecstasy (MDMA) Bible Thread 2.0

quote:

Originally posted by Masonious you win again dude - and nice move shoving the whole i figured out how to order pizza thing in my face. i tried that 4 and a half months ago and woke up with a Taiwanese transvestite but to Ygrene it's just, "anoother day in the life, noooo biggieee".

prostitutes can bang anyone, porn stars are only engaging in sex with other actors.


its a totally different service.

Wtf? Yes, they are prostitutes. They are being paid to have sex. IMO, it makes no difference if they are 'acting' or being 'paid to produce a product.'

Edit: Boomer, it's still sex. For money. If a hooker has a pimp, then they (the hooker) will most likely be told who to have sex with (by the pimp) as well. Just like a porn star.

___________________

pros·ti·tute
–noun

1. a woman who engages in sexual intercourse for money; whore; harlot.
2. a man who engages in sexual acts for money.
3. a person who willingly uses his or her talent or ability in a base and unworthy way, usually for money.

Porn stars fall into this category.

You don't have to be paid to be in porn.
Porn is safer and more controlled.
Nothing is against your will. (IE: Pimp a bitch, Cut a bitch...ect ect)
Hooker vagina smells like rotten goat cheese.
not the same
/thread

Some porn stars do however prostitute themselves on occasion.(IE Moonlight Bunny Ranch, Escorts for those with money to burn.)They are hoes but should be called something like ho supreme because you don't call fillet mignon steak.

No. Never considered porn stars to be prostitutes.

___________________
Like Progressive and Deep House? Grab my latest mix below
http://www.tranceaddict.com/forums/...s=#.UAv1rbRo3h4