 |
|
|
|
 |
hapamoto
R3ELISM
Registered: Jan 2002
Location: Canoga Park, California
|
|
|
i just put as many tracks until my time is up.. usually when we (my crew) spin parties, i only get an hour so i try to fill it up.. unless im recording a cd (or at least trying to) i just fill up the tape or as much room can fit!
|
|
Apr-11-2002 06:15
|
|
|
 |
 |
Dj Thy
Deckhead

Registered: May 2001
Location: Belgium, Earth
|
|
|
I guess that depends on several factors. And most of all it depends on the style you are spinning.
If you compare progressive vs hard techno... Progressive is much slower in buildup and so, you can say it's calmer. There is quite a lot happening in this music. So when mixing, you let the tunes speak. Let the buildup going, breakdown, and then when it's going towards the end again, you can bring in the new tune slowly (and in progressive mixes can last for very long, sometimes 2-3 minutes, addd that up and your time passed in a breeze).
As for techno or any other high energy music, you need to follow the energy of the style too, so you'll mix quite fast and quite a lot of tunes.
It's also a matter of how you wanna progress through your set. It's not only a matter of choosing the right tunes (calmer in the beginning, harder at the climax, and then calmer again), you can control it with the speed too. You can start mixing slowly in the beginning, and start to speed up more and more towards the climax.
Add triple turntable mixing to that, and you'll have even more speed (if you do it consistently, you can get to 50 tunes an hour, but that's hard as hell).
But, as I'm more a high energy music fan, yeah I try to avoid intro-outro mixing as much as possible. My ratio is about 20 tunes per 70 minutes.
|
|
Apr-11-2002 09:05
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
Lost
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Jul 2001
Location: Los Angeles/San Diego
|
|
|
i'm more into the slow prog, long drawn-out mixes. in the one 74 minute cd i made i believe i had around 11 tracks. when i used to mix uplifting trance i could get about 15-16 tracks in 74 minutes but the days of trance are dead for me. i like the steady chugging beats.
lost
___________________
"This book is dedicated, with love, to Bobby who found the only pound of pure - Faith in a Loving God." Hubert Selby, Jr. dedication to the latest edition of Requiem for a Dream
|
|
Apr-12-2002 15:44
|
|
|
 |
 |
wookieslut
HouseAddict
Registered: Apr 2001
Location:
|
|
|
usually 10 for a good hour...it seems so long after beat matching so many songs! it gets tiring on the mind sometimes to beatmatch more...the longest ive done was 2 hours at a party.
|
|
Apr-12-2002 23:08
|
|
|
 |
 |
Michael Russo
mmm mmm prog
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: Toronto, Canada
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by DJTJ
I prefer my mixes to be really long and smooth, and in the middle of songs there's just too much happening and it sounds horrible. So i usually wait till the end of a song before mixing, which means I only get about 10-12 songs on an 80 minute CD. |
Same here... there's too much going on in trance songs to mix through them quickly and have the mix sound good.
|
|
Apr-13-2002 03:46
|
|
|
 |
 |
Dj Flesch
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Aug 2001
Location: Indianapolis, USA
|
|
|
I usually end up with about 13 tracks on an 80 minute cd. I much perfer that the tracks play as long as I can let them with it still sounding good. What's the purpose of playing a track if it's not on long enough to let the crowd enjoy it and dance to it!
|
|
Apr-14-2002 08:06
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 16:36.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|