|
Re: Anti-Piracy laws, punishments and illegal downloads
///Can a person be prosecuted for downloading torrents and files from P2P softwares ?
hell yeah. downloading copyrighted material is a big no no. during the demise of napster (and everyone given a fair warning), the RIAA, on request from the artists, sued individuals serious wads of cash. (the initial lawsuits had $50k fine per song, multiplied by 3-4 songs a person can squeeze through a dial up line per night, and more upon investigation of the hard drive, etc. The fines have since gone down (at a request from the courts for the RIAA to quit stamping college kids, SSI-income families, poor people (pretty much the majority by landslide of filesharers), with 10 zillion dollar lawsuits. There is also CONSPIRACY to commit copyright infringement, which can be simply handed out (and documented thus) by going to your neighbor's house and noticing he has uTorrent on his computer. I read on digg yesterday that the MPAA was hosting their own movie-sharing site, just to catch people who would engage in filesharing (to which people say it illegal to perform illegal acts to catch criminals)
// What anti-piracy laws are applied against this type of a crime ?
copyright infringement(duplication, buying/selling copies without proper royalties, SHARING). Conspiracy for infringement(which includes 'supposedly' cracking anti-copying software encryption).
//What is the punishment ?
zillions of dollars in debt to downloading. If you are found to be part of a warez group organized to sharing files, jail time.
// But what about the people who just download them ?
illegal. $ fine. If the material is copyrighted and no royalties are being paid in the event that they should be, it's considered stealing revenue from a company. The more people that don't pay for attain the material, the less money the owner receives.
// Is it difficult to prosecute people who are caught downloading stuff ?
there has been a recent influx of people (namely students) who are successfully defending cases from the RIAA and MPAA, and the students are fighting back by countersuing asking for compensation for any debt they incurred paying legal fees. When it comes to a university student already in debt to men who drive to the court in a Benz, I think the judges are being a bit more level headed and quite sympathetic toward the students. Seems the chairmens of these organizations are in a stuggle between suing students or stopping them in their tracks from continuing the illegally fileshare.
no way is it difficult. Torrents usually have you IP shown to the world, as well as "l337" statistics to see how much of a beautiful sharer you are with the world. The big organizations can put up fake torrents filled with 600MBs of a dead avi file just to see which IPs connect, then use a lawyer to contact your ISP to send a cease/desist or launch a further investigation. It's almost too easy, considering the fact that they sometimes sue dead people or even non-existing who fall under no ISP service, no social security number and no billing address.
___________________
Everything is beautiful. Let the music carry you. Baby I will follow you forever. Nowhere else I'd rather be when you're lying next to me. Let the music carry us together.
anti-JennyPie Alliance
SuspicionVandit: Are you God?
Paul Van Dyk 09-24-2009: No, but I can sign your sleeve under that name if you let me!
|