raising my gun finga ina di air

wait... what?

___________________

Short time TA, Long time Guver, Good time giver.

quote:

Originally posted by Abercrombie wait... what?

LMAO

quote:

Originally posted by _EuG_ ITS TIME TO DECRIMINALIZE !!!!!

It'll never happen!!

___________________
FACEBOOK - http://facebook.com/djmrmorton

SOUNDCLOUD - http://soundcloud.com/djmrmorton

quote:

Originally posted by Abercrombie wait... what?

mari-giuana

160 million drug users worldwide? how the fuck do they come up with that figure? I use it (weed) fairly often but only my friends know so how would I (and everyone else like me) become a statistic? THose numbers just sound kinda silly, especially the weed usage down nearly 20% since 2003 or whatever. I don't buy that at all. It's easier to get now in most cities than it's ever been!

___________________
"No offense, but you're stupid"

quote:

Marijuana, or cannabis, remains the most commonly used drug in the world with almost 160 million people ages 15 to 64 using it in 2005, said the report, which was put out by the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. Usage is down slightly from 162 million, according to last year’s World Drug Report, which reviewed data from 2004.

ah...how about nicotine, tobacco, or alcohol?

I'm shocked. No, really.

___________________
My party schedule:
2009-02-21 - DJ Attention @ I'm So Popular
2009-06-18 - DJ Annoying @ People Need To Know Where I'll Be
2012-11-32 - DJ Insufferable ɸ Or At Least the Stalkers I Complain About
2048-06-66 - Spastic & Whocares ¶ Although I'm Actually Flattered
9999-45-81 - Tweaker Gimp ☼ I Probably Won't Even Go To This But I Have To Make Sure I Fill Up All The Available Space Here

quote:

Originally posted by Mortyman LMAO It'll never happen!!

There is no question that it will happen eventually; legalization will follow thereafter. It is now a matter of time. Both the Ontario and B.C. Superior Courts have agreed that Canada and the U.S. have laws in place which are out of touch with much of the Western world's means of dealing with cannabis possession (and by not directly refuting them, the SCC implicitly accepted various facts about marijuana such as its non-physiologically-addictive nature, its not being a gateway drug, and so on in the cases of Malmo-Levine, Clay, and Caine).

The Fed Liberals officially support decriminalization of personal possession and did, in fact, have a bill in Parliament when they were last in power which would amend the Contraventions Act and make personal possession punishable by a monetary fine (although the bill did contain a somewhat unclear provision whereby a criminal penalty could result after three incidents of being found with the substance had occurred).

quote:

Originally posted by cenik The Fed Liberals officially support decriminalization of personal possession

That's debatable. They decriminalized it and almost immediately recriminalized it. Really seemed more like a publicity stunt to me than an honest policy.

___________________
My party schedule:
2009-02-21 - DJ Attention @ I'm So Popular
2009-06-18 - DJ Annoying @ People Need To Know Where I'll Be
2012-11-32 - DJ Insufferable ɸ Or At Least the Stalkers I Complain About
2048-06-66 - Spastic & Whocares ¶ Although I'm Actually Flattered
9999-45-81 - Tweaker Gimp ☼ I Probably Won't Even Go To This But I Have To Make Sure I Fill Up All The Available Space Here

quote:

Originally posted by _EuG_ Canada Has the Most Pot Smokers in Industrialized World ITS TIME TO DECRIMINALIZE !!!!!

I don't see the point in decriminalization. As an ex avid pot smoker, I don't remember having any REAL legal issues, or knowing anyone that did as a result of personal use. Only those that traffic marijuanna did, and will continue to have issues even after decriminalization. I can't see it happening, not with all the anti-smoking (nicotine) by laws. And really what would change if they did ??? its not like pot-smokers don't already smoke wherever they want anyway....(at least I did).

And If they DO decriminalize it, I think they should take it a step further and legalize it for taxation purposes (like cigarettes).
*puts on flame gear*
Aside from whatever benefits people believe 'getting high' may have, their are still numerous side-effects to ones health (most can be avoided by ingesting it) that cost our health care system millions.

ASIDE: If the people that produce the weed get rich of peoples habit...don't you think the country that permits this behaviour should get piece of the pie since they deal with the consequences???

___________________
"I don't judge anyone except myself; you shouldn't either."

Last edited by Zentac_75 on Jul-22-2007 at 19:22

quote:

Originally posted by DigiNut That's debatable. They decriminalized it and almost immediately recriminalized it.

Incorrect.

Marijuana was never decriminalized in Canada by any government. A few summers ago a court ruling in Ontario found the medical marijuana laws in effect at the time to be unconstitutional; as a direct result of that decision, during those summer months marijuana possession charges were not laid and/or were not brought to court. The medical marijuana laws were later altered and charges for possession began once again.

quote:

Originally posted by DigiNut [Governmental moves toward decriminalization seem] more like a publicity stunt to me than an honest policy.

Granted it is in the interests of the government to support policies which aim to reflect the facts that 1) more than 10% of the Canadian population uses cannabis each year and 2) the majority of Canadians support decriminalization; I do think, however, that since, among other things, 1) the bill was officially working its way through the parliamentary processes required for legislation to become law and 2) the Liberals officially declared their belief that personal possession of cannabis ought not to be a punishable offence warranting criminal penalties suggest that this party--unlike, for instance, the Conservatives--does honestly support a change in marijuana possession laws.

I believe that one day in the future people will look back at the history of marijuana criminalization and, essentially, shake their heads at the failure of such a movement (e.g. the enormous financial costs of prohibition, the unethical punishment of an act which harms only the individual participating in such act, the harmful consequences resulting from a criminal conviction (e.g. labeling, restrictions on travel, and so on), and so on).

quote:

Originally posted by Zentac_75 I don't see the point in decriminalization. As an ex avid pot smoker, I don't remember having any REAL legal issues, or knowing anyone that did as a result of personal use. Only those that traffic marijuanna did, and will continue to have issues even after decriminalization.

Even though police officers routinely insist that their efforts are directed primary at individuals/groups who traffic and produce marijuana, crime statistics continuously demonstrate that the vast majority of charges and convictions for marijuana-related offences (somewhere in the neighbourhood of 90% I believe) in Canada are for personal possession.