holy shit, i would want meself one of those! however, there are two drawbacks: first, the pictures are stored in .bmp format. 2nd: low image quality (350kilopixels, compared to 1-3 megapixels in other cameras). but holy crap, this thing is amazing!
___________________
Mar-28-2002 02:00
Spyder
Anti BS Alliance
Registered: Feb 2002
Location: Toronto CDN
EEEK thats SMALLREAly small.. but i like it.. hehehehehehhehehehheheh
i want it.. hehehehehehehehheheh
___________________
Addicted to UKTA MySpace
Good Girls go to Heaven, Naughty Girls go to London Originally posted by jennypie
Because you're a filthy WHORE!
Mar-28-2002 02:03
OrZonE
Sp'ik'ars aDDicT
Registered: Nov 2001
Location: NY - Toronto, Canada
Does anyone else think that the guy in the first pic has hairy fingers???
___________________
Failed at becoming a god...
Mar-28-2002 06:20
whiskers
old skool
Registered: Sep 2001
Location: in your dreams
quote:
Originally posted by OrZonE
Does anyone else think that the guy in the first pic has hairy fingers???
well, what makes you think it's a guy...
___________________
Mar-28-2002 11:55
cycloptor
BANANA!!
Registered: Oct 2001
Location: the hammer
im pretty sure that you could do a lot better with your choice of digital camera....380kilopixels??? what the hell is that???? i've seen this reviewed on tech tv and not to be a jerk or anything, it stunk up the place hardcore... but on the other hand, if you just want to goof around for a tiny bit of cash go for it if ya want... im gonna go back to my olympus 3.3megapixel camera right now....
Mar-31-2002 16:42
Raptor
steve_k
Registered: Nov 2000
Location: L.A,Glasgow,Hong Kong
the camera is nice but cameras that get smaller and smaller the qaulity is lower, because of the lens size. but still one nice piece of equip right there.
Well, i liked for it's size, not the quality of course! I can carry it with me all the time, and people wouldn't even understand that I'm takin' pix of them