Few years ago. I remember someone wrote here that normalizing a mix is not very good for the quality of the song. I forgot the reasons.
My question is, how bad is it actually and how noticable is it on big systems?
Thanks!
___________________
quote:
Originally posted by Octanesyco
Greetings. My name is Casey. You can call me Moose.
-Moose
Feb-06-2008 21:04
Nightshift
...Ninja Business...
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Sacramento, California
Re: Normalizing, How bad is it for the quality?
quote:
Originally posted by Massive84
Few years ago. I remember someone wrote here that normalizing a mix is not very good for the quality of the song. I forgot the reasons.
My question is, how bad is it actually and how noticable is it on big systems?
Thanks!
its not bad as long as you dont overdo it.
Feb-06-2008 21:13
Eldritch
Eldritch Project
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: Sweden
It's not. Unless you're referring to peak normalization.
Feb-06-2008 21:30
Massive84
Old Relic
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Sequence Realm
quote:
Originally posted by Eldritch
It's not. Unless you're referring to peak normalization.
\
Not sure what that is. But i mean in a sense of removing clipping from the entire mix.
I know that usually stuff is masterd at a level of -0.2 db? Is this done with the help of normalizing?
___________________
quote:
Originally posted by Octanesyco
Greetings. My name is Casey. You can call me Moose.
-Moose
Feb-06-2008 22:02
Storyteller
Supreme tracneaddict
Registered: Feb 2005
Location: The Netherlands
It's just amplifying until the loudest point of the track hits 0dB. Quality impact should be neglible
If less is more think about how much more more would be.
-Frasier
Feb-06-2008 22:03
echosystm
super wow maker
Registered: Jul 2004
Location:
it will obviously bring up the noise floor, but you gotta do what you gotta do. you will often hear people saying "oh em gee dont do that!!11" on vocals etc., but you will no doubt drop the fader a bit anyway (lowers the noise floor).
___________________
quote:
Originally posted by DJ Robby Rox
I've never had a problem with FLs tech support till this day. (I've actually never used it till this day)
quote:
Originally posted by floyd741
i think echosystm is a pretty cool guy. eh pwns robby rox and doesn't afraid of anything.
Feb-06-2008 22:11
donnybrasco
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: L.A.
I'd rather have anything I put out playing at it's maximum playback level to begin with, raised noise floor and all (which there shouldn't be much if things were recorded properly to begin with)...as opposed to it entering an audio chain where it's going to have to be bumped anyway to be heard, but now you are elevating the noise floor of THAT chain as well in to the playback path so it can be heard at a SPL. See what I mean?
___________________
The thing about money? It makes you do things that you don't want to do
Feb-06-2008 23:28
Freak
Insert witty comment here
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: On a plane probably...
Go and listen to Orbital- 'chime'
Right... that was mastered directly onto a consumer CASSETTE deck as they couldnt afford a DAT machine at the time... all of the 12" copies were pressed up from that cassette master.
My point is, that noise isnt some evil thing in all forms- it could be argued its nicer than a overly clinically clean recording.
try it- if you like how it sounds then keep it. If it doesn't then bin it. As long as you don't do a destructive edit with no back up copy that is...
Feb-07-2008 00:24
lowski
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Feb 2006
Location:
quote:
Originally posted by Massive84
\Not sure what that is. But i mean in a sense of removing clipping from the entire mix.
I'm not an expert but i don't think you should have any clipping to remove from a mix. find the tracks that are clipping and fix them first.
as for normalizing?. i dont know much but i read that if your gonna normalize you should have a limiter set first?? dont know if that helps you much but maybe someone can add to that
good luck!!
Feb-07-2008 01:29
TaylorR
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: May 2005
Location:
quote:
Originally posted by echosystm
it will obviously bring up the noise floor
Feb-07-2008 08:16
thecYrus
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Oct 2002
Location:
usually compression or limiting is the better option. beside that you should record always as hot as possible especially when there's an analog signal path in your chain.
Feb-07-2008 12:26
kitphillips
is actually a guy.
Registered: May 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
I would have thought that compression and limiting are really not at all preferable? Since normalising doesn't affect the dynamic range, only the overall level, all thats happening is that your making the best use possible of the available headroom.
Obviously if what you want is a dynamics limiter then thats a different thing and a limiter/compressor is what you want.
There's no loss of quality either by the way, it should be done wherever you have a signal not using up all its headroom. Normalisation's just a basic tool which should be applied to all audio every time you record something, I'm suprised more people don't understand it