So I got the AKG K240 studio headphones gifted to me a few days ago and immediately i took them for a spin. Before this, I've been using the Sennheizer HD280's for approx. 5 years, and the very first thing I noticed was the incredibly deep and booming bass response on the K240's. I thought it was just my poorly mastered tracks, but I played a lot of different stuff on them - from professional trance, to industry-name hip-hop, to the Killers. Everything seemed to have a bit *too much* bass. This got me questioning - are these truly professional studio headphones, or are the K240's just fancy recreational phones? These headphones basically made every track sound like i was playing it with winamp's "Trance" Equalizer setting loaded (aka. the 'smile' frequency spectrum).
I'm a bit confused here because I always see the K240's being praised around the production forum and people swear by them. Is it just a matter of getting used to? I'm willing to invest the time to learn their sound and get adjusted to them, but i want to be sure that i'm adjusting to the correct thing.
Arpi - Somewhere Else (Stan Void Remix ) [ Neuroscience ] (Out Now)
Forerunners - Dragonfly (Stan Void Remix ) [ Solaris ] (Out Soon)
Stan Void - Transience [ Solaris ] (Out December 2008)
Stan Void - When You Know / Come Play [ Real Music ]
Stan Void - Montavo / A Moment's Definition [ Somatic Sense Vision ]
Dec-17-2007 21:16
kitphillips
is actually a guy.
Registered: May 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Since most club systems follow this curve the 240s probably make it easier to make stuff sound good on a club system.
Also, if the mids are overhyped, the song will sound better on cheaper systems which can only reproduce mids and not bass.
Originally posted by StanVoid
These headphones basically made every track sound like i was playing it with winamp's "Trance" Equalizer setting loaded (aka. the 'smile' frequency spectrum).
Funny, I thought the same about the HD-280 headphones. They have very exaggerated mids and too "punchy" bass compared to the AKGs and my monitors. The AKGs IMO have a more natural sound.
It takes some time to get used to. Also keep in mind that they have a burn-in period, and after that they will improve.
Dec-18-2007 12:25
Khayat
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Apr 2005
Location: Neverland
I just gt mine and The sound is so natural but as B_man said it will take some time to get used to
___________________
Stooped Cat
quote:
Life is to short to listen to something else than Trance
Dec-18-2007 13:28
alanzo
The Equalizer Womanizer
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Boston, MA
I noticed the same thing. Sony MDR headphones are a lot more natural sounding.
how big a difference one day can make! You guys were absolutely right - last night was my second night using the AKG's and I already noticed how much more natural sounding they are. As someone already mentioned, I find them to be the perfect complement to my monitors (dynaudio bm5a's), because they really expose everything (down to 15Hz!!!) going on in the low end. I put on my old Sennheizer HD280's afterwards just to remember what my old headphones sounded like, and it felt like my hands got tied behind my back. I couldn't hear much of the lows, the highs were through the roof, and the mids were actually boosted too high as well.
So there you have it, I also testify now - the AKG's are def. the way to go.
___________________
Arpi - Somewhere Else (Stan Void Remix ) [ Neuroscience ] (Out Now)
Forerunners - Dragonfly (Stan Void Remix ) [ Solaris ] (Out Soon)
Stan Void - Transience [ Solaris ] (Out December 2008)
Stan Void - When You Know / Come Play [ Real Music ]
Stan Void - Montavo / A Moment's Definition [ Somatic Sense Vision ]
Dec-18-2007 15:00
alanzo
The Equalizer Womanizer
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Boston, MA
quote:
Originally posted by StanVoid
So there you have it, I also testify now - the AKG's are def. the way to go.
Maybe I needs to get myself a pair, then...
Having multiple monitoring sources is always a good thing, though. So don't throw out the HD280s. Keep them as a third reference.
Originally posted by alanzo
Maybe I needs to get myself a pair, then...
Having multiple monitoring sources is always a good thing, though. So don't throw out the HD280s. Keep them as a third reference.
the hd280's have served me for way too long to just throw them away - they're sticking around that's for sure.
___________________
Arpi - Somewhere Else (Stan Void Remix ) [ Neuroscience ] (Out Now)
Forerunners - Dragonfly (Stan Void Remix ) [ Solaris ] (Out Soon)
Stan Void - Transience [ Solaris ] (Out December 2008)
Stan Void - When You Know / Come Play [ Real Music ]
Stan Void - Montavo / A Moment's Definition [ Somatic Sense Vision ]
Dec-18-2007 15:08
Fledz
Banned
Registered: Sep 2006
Location: London UK
quote:
Originally posted by StanVoid
how big a difference one day can make! You guys were absolutely right - last night was my second night using the AKG's and I already noticed how much more natural sounding they are. As someone already mentioned, I find them to be the perfect complement to my monitors (dynaudio bm5a's), because they really expose everything (down to 15Hz!!!) going on in the low end. I put on my old Sennheizer HD280's afterwards just to remember what my old headphones sounded like, and it felt like my hands got tied behind my back. I couldn't hear much of the lows, the highs were through the roof, and the mids were actually boosted too high as well.
So there you have it, I also testify now - the AKG's are def. the way to go.
Funny you say that because I mentioned they complement my monitors perfectly and yet I have the Dynaudio BM5a's as well
