 |
|
|
|
 |
s3nate
Choklit Reignnnnn
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Vancouver
|
|
|
Cheap ones might not hold their pitch that well. They also have a very low amount of torque.
Technics hold their pitch amazingly well, have a very high amount of torque and just an overall better feel.
|
|
Feb-07-2008 23:02
|
|
|
 |
 |
greenlight_in
tranceaddict in training
Registered: Feb 2008
Location: New Delhi, India
|
|
|
Hey guys,thanks for the response.
I have also been looking across web and figured that turntables in that range have shit torque,so ive managed to increase my budget a little and now im looking atStanton T.80 .
What do you guys think about that.
And regarding Technics,they shoot way above my budget,so im not even gonna look at them and feel like shit,since they are fucking beautiful!!
|
|
Feb-08-2008 08:23
|
|
|
 |
 |
greenlight_in
tranceaddict in training
Registered: Feb 2008
Location: New Delhi, India
|
|
|
Technics then huh!
Is anyone here selling them?!
Ill check the Buy/Sell thread.
Ok but what do you guys say about the Stanton T.80's.
|
|
Feb-08-2008 15:55
|
|
|
 |
 |
s3nate
Choklit Reignnnnn
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Vancouver
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by echosystm
lies. technics 1200s have very low torque by todays standards. the motors are good quality and last though.
greenlight_in, numark tt200s are the cheapest you should bother with. the 1650s are belt drive. numark tt200s will be a good buy, as they have similar specifications and feel as a 1200 (in terms of spin up & torque etc.). however, they won't last as long obviously. |
I never knew this! Thanks for correcting me.
|
|
Feb-09-2008 12:34
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 18:18.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|