Originally posted by Spacey Orange
can someone define this?
More difficult than you'd think to answer. I could go to wikipedia and copy/paste if you'd like, but I wouldn't be able to explain it any better than what was initially written from them.
I have a general grasp of it in my head. But putting word to paper on the subject, I fall short.
Registered: Jan 2004
Location: 9 Bywater Street, Chelsea, London
A terrorist is a person or a group fighing for a cause you do not agree with
Mar-04-2008 10:30
Q5echo
asymetrical scepticism
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Dallas
quote:
Originally posted by George Smiley
A terrorist is a person or a group fighing for a cause you do not agree with
thats not violent enough. you gotta invoke TERROR!!!!!!!
we need blood and guts and firetrucks!
Mar-04-2008 11:01
pkcRAISTLIN
arbiter's chief minion
Registered: Jul 2002
Location:
reverse-kangering someone else's toilet.
___________________
Mar-04-2008 11:16
Q5echo
asymetrical scepticism
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Dallas
quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
reverse-kangering someone else's toilet.
...poop would work too i suppose
Mar-04-2008 11:38
Chryz707
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Sep 2004
Location: Here and there
Toilet Terrorism = Going to a restaurant and piss all over the toilet seat, toilet paper (soak it good) and then pee on the sink handles and sink. Then leave. and if you really are vile... Shit on the floor. Thats Hateful shit to do...
___________________
Kill 1 Person thats Murder, kill 100,000 People thats foriegn policy!
Mar-04-2008 12:07
Capitalizt
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Feb 2005
Location: USA
my definition...a terrorist is someone who attacks non-military targets in order to spread fear through a population with the goal of affecting political change. I think people on both sides of the war can agree with this definition.
Mar-04-2008 12:20
Q5echo
asymetrical scepticism
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Dallas
quote:
Originally posted by Capitalizt
my definition...a terrorist is someone who attacks non-military targets in order to spread fear
i don't disagree with you, but what is this?
Mar-04-2008 12:30
Capitalizt
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Feb 2005
Location: USA
quote:
Originally posted by Q5echo
i don't disagree with you, but what is this?
USS Cole? I wouldn't consider that terrorism at all. It was an attack on the military force of their enemy. They meant to do damage...not to invoke fear and terror.
Mar-04-2008 13:57
Chryz707
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Sep 2004
Location: Here and there
It was a terrorist act, because the people were operating covertly and looked like they were going to assist the Cole.
___________________
Kill 1 Person thats Murder, kill 100,000 People thats foriegn policy!
