It's a great, convenient solution to be sure, but I haven't seen any of these that output greater than 160 kbps. Kinda defeats the purpose of transferring high quality vinyl. I guess it's better than nothing, but you'd be better off recording directly into a sound card or mixer and recording that was with something like Audacity.
___________________
Click the link below to stream all of my mixes past and present. New mixes go up about once a month. Enjoy!
Maybe I'm overly cynical, but am I the only one thinking "who fucking cares?" Anyone with any real desire for this kind of product has already gone down to Radio Shack and gotten a $2 cable to pipe their old turntables into their PC's line in.
Originally posted by nrjizer
Maybe I'm overly cynical, but am I the only one thinking "who fucking cares?" Anyone with any real desire for this kind of product has already gone down to Radio Shack and gotten a $2 cable to pipe their old turntables into their PC's line in.
Not overly cynical at all - in fact I'd agree, however the majority of people who read MSNBC probably haven't a clue, so my guess is this is designed more the "vinyl enthusiast" as opposed to the "DJ vinyl enthusiast."
Am I mistaken, or didn't the NYTimes do a story on direct-to-MP3 turntables like 2 years ago? I'm pretty sure there's a David Pogue video of it somewhere...
Registered: Jul 2002
Location: Tucson, AZ (for now)
quote:
Originally posted by cmay119
Recording from the Analog source retains that Analog sound.
LOL... tahst funny. "I prefer the analog sound" yeah when you rip ur vinyl it adds depth and removes that analog warmth lol...
I just use a griffin iMic works great, 25 bucks
___________________
quote:
Originally posted by RJT
I think it's more like throwing a baby shower for an abortion.
quote:
Originally posted by Kevy Kev
When I lived in Vegas I once peed in the elevator at the MGM, cut it off mid stream to let a family get in then finished peeing when they got out of the elevator.