|
There is no perfect health care system.
In the US it's expensive, and not everyone can afford it currently, but as long as you have insurance, you get the care you want, when you need it (over-simplification, I know). And contrary to popular belief, no one dies because they don't have insurance. If you have an acute issue and go the hospital, you will be treated, regardless of whether you ever pay.
In most socialized countries, everyone has some form of basic healthcare, but that usually comes along with longer waiting times and the possibility of having treatments delayed or denied due to resource constraints. As in the US, no one dies because of these constraints because acute concerns get priority.
So, you have to pick your poison; pay for health care via taxes and everyone gets it, but most likely you're going to have delays in care and aspects of care dictated by the government. Or, you can have expensive health insurance like in the US, but you'll get better access while leaving some uninsured. The answer is probably somewhere in the middle, maybe like Australia, where you have a two-tiered system. The problem with two-tiered systems is then you generally establish two tiers of health quality where those using government health care suffer.
Ideologically socialized medicine is great, but it has pitfalls just like private insurance does.
|