|
ah, i see what you were saying about predictability. if you ever listen to a lot of genre-crossover mixes (ambient to more beaty stuff and the like) then you find people generally try the same stuff. it's not dance music, but patterns show up everywhere. you're right when you say i won't know where the mix will be after 20 minutes from just one track, but listening to 2 or 3 and how you transition between them will give me a very good idea.
i don't know how to accurately describe this, but music has to "flow". i wasn't critiquing from a dance music point of view, but i still expect some transitions. imagine you were at a concert and the venue is your house. the audience: you. a synthesized symphony is rocking your speakers, preparing you for what will follow. from that track there is a guitar-solo oriented performance thats untraditional and interestingly worked in. and now, epicness ensues. a full orchestra with a chorus comes out and performs 3 tracks. the conductor kind of loses his place between them and the result is not so smooth, but passable. you could still have a great night at this point. the orchestra and drum machine that is playing suddenly loses steam at this point and a junglist influenced by hip-hop waltzes in and connects the speaker system to his mp3 player. a raucous beat comes out (only raucous because the contrast is so severe). after the track, the perpetrator is kicked off to cries of "...bumbaclott! that was a sick tune!". the next performer recovers, and things continue more or less traditionally - although going from song to song is a problem. this would at least feel weird, no?
sorry for making your mix look so absurd with my description, but i think this will illustrate my point most interestingly. if a song doesn't fit nicely, and after many attempts, still doesn't fit, then you put in another song or just take that one out - especially if you had as much time as you wanted .
and about that first transition, sometimes all you need to do is cut it . if it works, it just works.
|