What do you think is the better deal... assuming these are roughly the same price, a quad core Intel Core 2 at around 2.4Ghz vs a dual core 3.14Ghz... perhaps this is bogus but I remember reading somewhere that running multiple threads of data can sometimes increase latency when it comes to audio playback
Also, anyone know how much of an impact the supposed lack of cache memory on the Quad core has?
Jun-18-2008 21:46
Waza
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Feb 2008
Location: Scotland, Edinburgh
i would always go for quad core i'm running quad core and its very smooth runs.
Jun-18-2008 22:36
Zombie0729
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: .
you sure do have a lot of questions...
i was on a dual and now onto a quad, no problems here
Originally posted by davidbuhau
i have a quad core amd and i'm perfectly happy with it... i don't have it overclocked, and it seems to be working just fine
heh
david
Yeah they run smoothly at stock, but also has a great overclocking potential.
Registered: Jul 2002
Location: somewhere between the melody and the pads
also.. bear in mind they're the same sockets and assuming you do what i did and got a 1333 fsb'd mobo then you could just buy a quad core chip net year when they come down when intel introduces nehalem.
quote:
Originally posted by echosystm
I'd get a faster dual core if I was using FL Studio or Reason (because they have shit/no multicore support).