 |
|
|
|
 |
xtr3m
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: Vancouver
|
|
|
What do you mean? Torq is almost twice cheaper than Serato; it's the cheapest solution.
I have one and it's pretty decent. Torq 1.5 update is in the works and apparently it's a pretty big one.
Check out their forums for more feedback.
|
|
Aug-18-2007 11:30
|
|
|
 |
 |
Ryan0751
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: May 2005
Location: Boston, MA
|
|
|
Actually I have Torq and find it to be a lot of fun, and quite stable. It does everything SSL does and more. If I were using something out at a venue every weekend, however, I might go with SSL.
But SSL doesn't even currently support MIDI, nor effects, nor a sampler... seems a bit odd.
The Conectiv is not a controller. It's just the audio interface for using timecode with Torq.
If you buy the Xponent, you get a MIDI controller and audio interface, plus the software. The device looks rather interesting... if I were looking at a solution that was just Laptop+Some device, I'd go for the Xponent.
Why? It's all perfectly integrated with Torq. Provided you like Torq, that's a good thing. Everything just works out of the box. The pitch controls are high-resolution (most MIDI controllers only give you 127 steps, which means you'll have LESS than .1% pitch precision). And the jog wheels look like they work really well (the Vestax also looks nice).
My issues with the xponent:
1. It's all plastic.
2. It has no inputs, so if you decide to get decks and use DVS someday, you have to buy the Conectiv.
3. No Mic input or controllable booth output.
|
|
Aug-20-2007 15:09
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 22:13.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|