anyone know what he uses??im curious to know because especially in the track "exactly" there is so much going on..he must have needed a bomb of ram..ive given up on tryin to make trance coz it gets so frustrating when the computer maxes out half way through with such thick fat saws..electro is much easier on ram...is there a magical answer how this is done??and not by using freeze track because its impossible to know when u want to filter out sounds and automate before everything is in place and playing at the same time....

i was just wondering..

If you're using vst instruments that aren't say ROMplers, chances are your cpu/soundcard is holding you back.. and not your ram.. RAM effects sample based recording more.

___________________
Recently released:
Aesthetic - Twilight Sky [Primal-Recordings]

http://www.wtfnews.org

quote:

Originally posted by Aesthetic RAM effects sample based recording more.

You got that, mac...
I am reminded of that grave reality every time I load Philharmonik Miroslav... I need some cash for a cache...

___________________
...On college-driven hiatus...

its all about sound engineering in that tune.. all melodies and piano roll patterns fit everywhere so well in place, that actually even 3 vst's playing at a time with melodies playing together could slow down your pc drastically..

___________________
www.soundcloud.com/rinster

I think that this is not so much of VST. Remember that a lot times hardware synths are used... and of course if you try to do all that things in just one shot... well, here it is when you get frustrating because the red led of you processor gets turned on to its maximum because the lots of VST's and effects you're using actually hehe...

Anyway... When I'm working with this kind of sounds that can cause a several CPU usage... the only thing that I do is record a dry sound... for example... a saw lead... then... I just drop it in a Multitracker rewired to my Main DAW... and just add all effects, filters... etc.

But I use this method rarely... because as I said before... just when a sound could crash my performance. But obviously it has disadvantages. =/

Cheers!
Gabo van Lugo

U should use a DAW that utilizes more cpu-cores, on both effects and vst-instruments, like Ableton. In FL for instance u can only run multithreading on the vst-instruments.. when the effects actually require much more resources than the vst-instruments (if u use alot of them, like me.)

Its all about CPU power. Thats what u run out of.

When I start arranging my tracks, I always use Cubase´s freeze function on static tracks like midbasses to save some power...

___________________
"nee, de plaat heeft geen kras! dat hoort zo!!!"

Agenda 2009:

WinterWorld, Sporthalle Oberwerth, Koblenz
Trance Energy, Jaarbeurs Utrecht
Mayday, Westfalenhallen, Dortmund
Nature One, Pydna, Kastellaun / Hunsrück

Cubase + Intel Dual/Quad core + 2+GB of RAM will provide all your synth needz

___________________
http://soundcloud.com/drewwihl

Well I've just gone from a single core 1.8Ghz to an quadcore 2.66. the 1.8Ghz was enough already, so I'll be good for at least some years now hahaha. I could even turn off the other 3 cores and still be off better than I was before

___________________

Storyteller Website | Storyteller @ Facebook | Storyteller @ Beatport | Storyteller @ Soundcloud | Stephen J. Kroos - Europa (Storyteller Remix)
Anthony Mea - Get It On (Storyteller Remix)

quote:

If less is more think about how much more more would be. -Frasier

quote:

Originally posted by daeus Cubase + Intel Dual/Quad core + 2+GB of RAM will provide all your synth needz

This will do you justice. I'm using a quad core CPU, Q6600, and 4GB of RAM in XP using the /3GB switch option, and it can handle ridiculously large project files.

I will say that line, "he must have needed a bomb of ram" cracked me up!

___________________

-Facebook- -SoundCloud-

quote:

Originally posted by ******** ^^for the next 6 months to year.

Running 7-8 instances of Albino3 at full capacity on my Core2Duo 2.4Ghz .... that power's gonna last me for more than 6 months

Albino is a CPU hog, (when testing I run 2 oscs with spread, both filters, saturation and 3 stereo processing filters)



Just for kicks I decided to see how many instances of Synth1 I could run:

The Unofficial "How many Synth1 instances can I run?"

Core2Duo 2.4Ghz
2gig DDR2 800mhz
Ableton Live 7 as host
M-Audio Delta 44 audio interface, 48Khz, 384 samples, 7ms latency

Synth1: both oscs. on , osc.1 with unison, filter on, LFO in use, EQ and chorus effect on.

I was playing an 8-note chord with a rather long release, and it retriggered every eight-note, so each instance had to handle up to 16 voices.

Results: I was able to run 44 instances simultaneously before getting buffer-issues

stay off the drugs son

___________________
Recently released:
Aesthetic - Twilight Sky [Primal-Recordings]

http://www.wtfnews.org