|
| quote: | Originally posted by Shakka
Adamant supporters of anyone and anything are very difficult to convince to change their opinions. Such has been the case with George Bush, though certainly not as much in the last 4 years as the first 4). With the love affair that is Obama, it is not surprising that his defenders will, metaphorically, fight to the death to defend his clearly radical ambitions. With a likely congressional supermajority and given the context of that radio interview where he thinks "redistribution" and "economic justice" should be achieved legislatively vs. via the courts, the next few years should be very interesting and very telling. No doubt his defenders and the media will be lapping it up for a while, but his true colors should really shine depending on how he pursues his agenda. |
I'm withholding judgment for the time being, but I'll only point out that this idea that terrifies you so hasn't always been very controversial:
| quote: | | The necessaries of life occasion the great expense of the poor. . . . The luxuries and vanities of life occasion the principal expense of the rich, and a magnificent house embellishes and sets off to the best advantage all the other luxuries and vanities which they possess. . . . It is not very unreasonable that the rich should contribute to the public expense, not only in proportion to their revenue, but something more than in that proportion. |
Adam Smith, father of capitalism.
___________________
|