|
| quote: | Originally posted by Zild
Thanks. You said to stay away from the original 828. Should I stay away from older versions of the ultralite like the MK2? |
Sorry - in my lat post everytime I said "traveller" I meant ultralite.
As I remember, the difference between the ultralite mk2 and mk3 is juse that the mk3 has built in DSP fx, which some people absolutely rave about, but others don't care for. Apart from that, they are both really solid and sound great.
The 828 has been about for years and the original 828's, while still good pieces of kit, are up to 10 years old. There were some issues with FW stability on the mk1, which were all sorted by the Mk2. The Mk3 has the same new DSP too and goes to 192 khz.
If you're happy working at normal samples rates then go for the mk2, but if you've got the cash and fancy the DSP (I hear the LA2A and mix routing option are great) then go for the mk3.
If you need it portable, and want the fx, go for the ultralite mk3 and if you just want a good portable solution then go for the ultralite mk2.
|