 |
|
|
|
 |
R!CH
check signal

Registered: Sep 2004
Location: potrero hill
|
|
|
Dec-04-2008 20:10
|
|
|
 |
 |
darin epsilon
www.darinepsilon.com
Registered: Apr 2006
Location: LA / CHI
|
|
|
Dec-04-2008 21:25
|
|
|
 |
 |
DJ RANN
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: May 2001
Location: Hollywood....
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by darin epsilon
I personally could care less about the Grammy's, and I'm sure a lot of people feel the same way. There is a lot of fantastic music that goes under the radar. Like Rich says, it's just a giant promotional tool to sell more records than anything else. Same reason why they only bother to showcase popular styles of music on TV.
Oscars are a little bit different though. It takes enormous resources to create a good movie. Anyone can make a good track because of the technology that's available for cheap, but not everyone can make a great movie, just based on how much money and manpower it actually takes to pull it off. Those home movies people make just aren't quite going to cut it. |
+1 one the Grammys, it's simply about marketing and unit sales.
However, I don't want to burst your collective bubble about the Oscars, but seriously, it's all about connections, not a great films. So many outstanding films miss even Oscar nominations while other big budget slabs of worthless junk win oscars simply because of the producer/directors ability to secure votes.
Sometimes truly worthy films and people do win, and it's great when they get the recognition but so many best actor and best film Oscars just go to the one who has the most powerful agent, or which studio really needs their film to be a hit (cases in point Chicago, Cold Mountain, and guess what, they were both weinstein movies....).
You have to realize there is a whole Oscar lobbying industry that has grown - if a film wins an oscar, it's worth in excess of $100 to the studio in terms of future sales of that film or star and several million to the agents too.
The Oscars are amazing as a spectacle, but not that real in terms of awards.
|
|
Dec-04-2008 22:33
|
|
|
 |
 |
darin epsilon
www.darinepsilon.com
Registered: Apr 2006
Location: LA / CHI
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by DJ RANN
+1 one the Grammys, it's simply about marketing and unit sales.
However, I don't want to burst your collective bubble about the Oscars, but seriously, it's all about connections, not a great films. So many outstanding films miss even Oscar nominations while other big budget slabs of worthless junk win oscars simply because of the producer/directors ability to secure votes.
Sometimes truly worthy films and people do win, and it's great when they get the recognition but so many best actor and best film Oscars just go to the one who has the most powerful agent, or which studio really needs their film to be a hit (cases in point Chicago, Cold Mountain, and guess what, they were both weinstein movies....).
You have to realize there is a whole Oscar lobbying industry that has grown - if a film wins an oscar, it's worth in excess of $100 to the studio in terms of future sales of that film or star and several million to the agents too.
The Oscars are amazing as a spectacle, but not that real in terms of awards. |
You probably have a really good point there, the Oscars are probably just as crooked, if not more crooked, than the Grammy's. However, in most cases, just as a personal observation, the Best Picture winner usually deserves it. There have been a few hits and misses but in general, but the ones that do win, always turn out to be exceptional films.
___________________
www.darinepsilon.com
www.facebook.com/darinepsilonofficial
www.soundcloud.com/darinepsilon
www.beatport.com/artist/darin-epsilon/31025
www.twitter.com/darinepsilon
www.youtube.com/darinepsilon
|
|
Dec-04-2008 22:50
|
|
|
 |
 |
alan
is INCOGNITO

Registered: Sep 2007
Location: Woodland Hills, CA
|
|
|
Albeit all points are good, IMO, there is a need for these "contests" so to speak.
Indeed, some people have used the system to their own advantage by going around the spirit of the awards.
If its a bunch of media or writers deciding whats the best film to watch or music to listen to, then indeed there might be some bias that can come about.
But something like a real widespread and mass consumer contest is actually a good way that provides structure to the industry and allows a base to who is most popular to the end user.
In a parallel world where everybody is a DJ, Obama is the guy who just won Best DJ and was voted the most number of times by the consumers. There will always be other people that think McCain is better. There will be some purists that Bush is still the best DJ. Music is a preference and to each his own. As such, there will always be others who think Obama is not so good at all, and Palin is so much better.
But at the end of the day, Obama won and there is a reason for that. We just have to give respect to the majority (if indeed the contest and voting was legit), acknowledge that this DJ moves more people than others (i.e. Tiesto who I dont like), then get to our own cars and listen to what we like (I personally like listening to QUIVVER, who is spinning on Friday Dec 5 @King King).
Just my two cents worth.

___________________
www.iluvincognito.com
INCOGNITO - Where amazing cutting edge dance music happens
DRENCHED - Daytime pool parties
MOONLIGHT - Evening open air parties
ARTWALK AFTERHOURS - One offs
TEKNOLOGIK - One offs
|
|
Dec-04-2008 23:17
|
|
|
 |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 00:32.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|