Become a part of the TranceAddict community!Frequently Asked Questions - Please read this if you haven'tSearch the forums
TranceAddict Forums > DJing / Production / Promotion > Production Studio > Correlation between music and mathematics.
Pages (2): [1] 2 »   Last Thread   Next Thread
Share
Author
Thread    Post A Reply
Stef
come @ me bro



Registered: Aug 2007
Location: NYC
Correlation between music and mathematics.

Basically i have a final paper coming up and this was the topic i picked out of the ones available. I remember reading stuff that BT wrote about the connection but still have come up short trying to find those articles.

If anyone has any articles they'd like to share or have any input on the topic it would be quite cool.

So what do you guys, how strong is the connection between music (production and just listening) and mathematics?

Old Post Jun-07-2009 23:08 
Click Here to See the Profile for Stef Click here to Send Stef a Private Message Add Stef to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
kadomony
FRENCH EXPRESS



Registered: Jul 2004
Location: Philly

I'd say it's pretty much everything.

Sound is generated by waves which can be replicated through mathematical expressions (ie digitally)

Each scale also has set defined mathematical intervals between the notes as well.

Back in the day I knew this guy who used his knowledge geometry to create his own scales.


___________________
www.misterfalconmusic.com

Old Post Jun-07-2009 23:29  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for kadomony Click here to Send kadomony a Private Message Visit kadomony's homepage! Add kadomony to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
MrJiveBoJingles
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Jun 2004
Location: U.S.

quote:
Originally posted by MrJiveBoJingles
[This is mainly for those of you who (like me) are interested in the mathematical qualities of music, but it's good information for anyone.]

Producers of electronic music deal quite a bit with frequencies; cutting them out, shifting them over time, boosting them, changing the proportions between them, and so on. "Sound waves" are our way of conceptualizing the motion of air molecules that occurs when some mechanical or electrical event (which we refer to as "striking a note") happens, and frequency is a measure how fast these waves of molecules move up and down. Frequency is specified in "Hertz (Hz)," which means "cycles per second."

Low frequency wave (top) and high frequency wave (bottom):



In terms of human hearing, lower and higher frequencies mean lower and higher "pitches," and musicians and musical theorists in the past made organized systems of pitches to designate what frequencies their instruments should play; they based these systems of pitches both on what was pleasing to the human ear and on what was mathematically "beautiful," and we still use these systems today.

What a tuning system specifies is how the physical frequencies designated by musical "notes" relate mathematically to one another. In Western music, the "reference frequency" used to tune most instruments is called "A 440" or "A4." That is, "A4" on a keyboard or other instrument is defined as the key which, when pressed, will cause the instrument to release a sound wave with a frequency of 440 Hz. When a note (call it "X") is an octave above or below another note (call it "Y"), that means that note X has a frequency either twice that or half that of note Y, respectively. A half-step is the distance between one note and the next (ratio between the two frequencies) in a given Western tuning system.

All the stuff mentioned in the last paragraph is universal in traditional Western music and in all non-experimental modern pop music, which includes most electronic music. Where things get complicated is in how specific tuning systems derive the frequencies of individual notes from octave to octave. The most popular tuning system in modern Western music is called equal temperament tuning (more specifically, twelve-tone equal temperament tuning). It gradually became the most popular because it contains no "wolf intervals" (very harsh-sounding frequency ratios which make it unfeasible to use an acoustic instrument to play in multiple keys without retuning it). Here is how equal temperament tuning works:

Equal Temperament Tuning

Twelve-tone equal temperament tuning, or 12-TET for short, specifies the frequency difference from one note to the next by using a constant ratio. This ratio is derived in the following manner:

Remember from above that two notes being an octave apart means that the pitch of one is twice that of another. Consider two notes, A4 and A5, which are an octave apart. We can represent their frequencies in the following way:

Frequency of A4 = f(A4)

Frequency of A5 = f(A5)

Since A5 is twice the frequency of A4, the ratio of f(A5) to f(A4) is 2 to 1 (2:1).

Now remember that there are twelve tones in our desired tuning system, and we want the tones to increase or decrease using a constant ratio from frequency to frequency. We will designate this ratio "R." If our system is going to have twelve tones, then it must be the case that R is a number that when multipled by itself twelve times will equal two: otherwise we could not use it to specify the twelve intervals that go to make up an octave in a Western tuning system. Another way of saying "R multiplied by itself twelve times" is just R^12 ("R to the twelfth power").

So this means that:

Ratio of f(A5) to f(A4) = 2:1 = R^12.

How do we remove the exponent from R^12? Easy: we take the twelfth-root of both terms in the following equation:

2/1 = R^12

...so...

Twelfth Root of 2 = R

The twelfth root of 2 is approximately 1.05946309. So this is the number we will use to specify the ratio of the frequency of one note to the frequency of the note below it. Consider A4; its frequency is 440 Hz. To derive Bb4, the next highest note in the tuning system, we would multiply 440 by 1.05946309. This gives us 466 Hz, which will be the frequency of Bb4 in our system. To get the next highest note, B, we would multiply 466 by 1.05946309 (or 440 by 1.05946309 times 1.05946309, which amounts to the same thing). This will give us 494 Hz, the frequency of B.

By now you can see the pattern: to get a note that is X half-steps up from the "root" note, we must multiply the frequency of the root note by R^X. If you have any trouble understanding this process, the following chart should help clear things up:



How would you derive the frequencies of notes below A4? Easy: instead of multiplying in order to go up, you would divide to go down, using the exact same pattern -- X semi-tones down from A4 = 440 / (R^X).

http://www.tranceaddict.com/forums/...threadid=361540

Old Post Jun-07-2009 23:35  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for MrJiveBoJingles Click here to Send MrJiveBoJingles a Private Message Add MrJiveBoJingles to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
DigiNut
You kids get off my lawn!



Registered: Dec 2002
Location: Toronto, Self-proclaimed Centre of the Universe

Kind of a weak topic IMO.

Musical tones correspond to frequencies, and musical timbres correspond to various harmonics. In some cases, musical concepts like octaves are related by mathematical formulas.

...

Yeah... so? Waveforms and signals are concepts from physics, not mathematics, and even the notion that music relates to physics is a bit of a raised-eyebrow hypothesis.

Sure, you can apply certain mathematical concepts to music, same as you can apply mathematical concepts to biology or to football. Math is just a syntax for creating abstract models of the physical world, and music is one of many different things you might want to model.

I suppose you could compare them on the basis that "music" as we think of it is also an abstract model, that notes and scales and chords are just abstract representations of an underlying reality that's actually much more complex, but we work with so many abstractions of so many things that it would be hard to make a convincing case for that particular parallel being somehow unique. Or you could focus on modern music production and how it's all based on signal processing which is highly mathematical in nature, but I think that's a weak hypothesis (you could say the same thing about animation).

Personally, I think most of the "music is math" fluff is just rhetoric and stoner-talk from people who haven't had a lot of experience in one or the other. I have, and I've never noticed any interesting analogies that I would classify as more than coincidental. But you say you've already chosen the topic so... good luck. I think you'll need it.


___________________
My party schedule:
2009-02-21 - DJ Attention @ I'm So Popular
2009-06-18 - DJ Annoying @ People Need To Know Where I'll Be
2012-11-32 - DJ Insufferable ɸ Or At Least the Stalkers I Complain About
2048-06-66 - Spastic & Whocares Although I'm Actually Flattered
9999-45-81 - Tweaker Gimp I Probably Won't Even Go To This But I Have To Make Sure I Fill Up All The Available Space Here

Old Post Jun-07-2009 23:50  Canada
Click Here to See the Profile for DigiNut Click here to Send DigiNut a Private Message Add DigiNut to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Subtle
Subreme tranceaddict



Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Urban Shakedown

Isnt Aphex Twin one of those who uses mathematics for music ?


___________________


http://soundcloud.com/subtara

Old Post Jun-07-2009 23:56  Norway
Click Here to See the Profile for Subtle Click here to Send Subtle a Private Message Visit Subtle's homepage! Add Subtle to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
MrJiveBoJingles
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Jun 2004
Location: U.S.

My impression is that Aphex Twin is more of a hands-on, "take my synth apart and get out my soldering iron" kind of guy than a "write equations on my computer" kind of guy. Although the two aren't always mutually exclusive, of course.

Old Post Jun-07-2009 23:59  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for MrJiveBoJingles Click here to Send MrJiveBoJingles a Private Message Add MrJiveBoJingles to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
gr8ape
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Jul 2005
Location:

quote:
Originally posted by DigiNut
Kind of a weak topic IMO.

Musical tones correspond to frequencies, and musical timbres correspond to various harmonics. In some cases, musical concepts like octaves are related by mathematical formulas.

...

Yeah... so? Waveforms and signals are concepts from physics, not mathematics, and even the notion that music relates to physics is a bit of a raised-eyebrow hypothesis.

Sure, you can apply certain mathematical concepts to music, same as you can apply mathematical concepts to biology or to football. Math is just a syntax for creating abstract models of the physical world, and music is one of many different things you might want to model.

I suppose you could compare them on the basis that "music" as we think of it is also an abstract model, that notes and scales and chords are just abstract representations of an underlying reality that's actually much more complex, but we work with so many abstractions of so many things that it would be hard to make a convincing case for that particular parallel being somehow unique. Or you could focus on modern music production and how it's all based on signal processing which is highly mathematical in nature, but I think that's a weak hypothesis (you could say the same thing about animation).

Personally, I think most of the "music is math" fluff is just rhetoric and stoner-talk from people who haven't had a lot of experience in one or the other. I have, and I've never noticed any interesting analogies that I would classify as more than coincidental. But you say you've already chosen the topic so... good luck. I think you'll need it.


Well said im in math in college, took some signal processing classes, and played piano for almost 10 years and I can tell you, although you can EXPLAIN some musical stuff with math, music isnt math lol

Old Post Jun-08-2009 02:11  Canada
Click Here to See the Profile for gr8ape Click here to Send gr8ape a Private Message Add gr8ape to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Kismet7
nononoyesyesyesnonono



Registered: Dec 2008
Location: earf

I think the coorelation of music to trees is more important. /what a hippy would say.

And I would agree.


___________________
_____________________________________
commercial and underground electronic music (house/techno/trance/other) will surpass today's hip hop/pop/rock/country in worldwide interest...if it has'nt already.

Old Post Jun-08-2009 03:06  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for Kismet7 Click here to Send Kismet7 a Private Message Add Kismet7 to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
DJ RANN
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: May 2001
Location: Hollywood....

I'm split about this.

As an engineer, you really realise how much of music IS math and vice versa, and even though part of me says music is random, and creative thought without constraints, so is math, once you get beyond the standard laymen and high school definition. The chaos that math can have and the fact it governs everything and that nothing is truly original or random, makes it seem so close to music.....



............but as Elvis (the other one) says:

"writing about music is like dancing about architecture"

Old Post Jun-08-2009 05:12 
Click Here to See the Profile for DJ RANN Click here to Send DJ RANN a Private Message Add DJ RANN to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Felix Hoo
Junior tranceaddict



Registered: Apr 2006
Location: Manhattan, NYC

If you consider composed experimental music as music, then you can look into Barry Truax who created Riverrun using real time implementation of granular synthesis.He uses uniform random distributions to control the grain parameters, producing a stochastic music based on probabilities.

Old Post Jun-08-2009 06:58  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for Felix Hoo Click here to Send Felix Hoo a Private Message Visit Felix Hoo's homepage! Add Felix Hoo to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
flutlicht junky
in das haus



Registered: Oct 2001
Location: Bournemouth, UK

Music is basically number in time therefore yes music 'is' maths


___________________
Kuroi
@ web/Kuroi Music
@ myspace/Kuroi Music

promo track: Mirco de Govia - Voller Sterne (Kuroi Remix)

Old Post Jun-09-2009 17:41  United Kingdom
Click Here to See the Profile for flutlicht junky Click here to Send flutlicht junky a Private Message Visit flutlicht junky's homepage! Add flutlicht junky to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Zak McKracken
Trance



Registered: Jun 2003
Location:

aphex twin is one of those who live in a bulletproof tank

Old Post Jun-09-2009 19:05 
Click Here to See the Profile for Zak McKracken Click here to Send Zak McKracken a Private Message Add Zak McKracken to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message

TranceAddict Forums > DJing / Production / Promotion > Production Studio > Correlation between music and mathematics.
Post New Thread    Post A Reply

Pages (2): [1] 2 »  
Last Thread   Next Thread
Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackmust have this amazing track [2006] [6]

Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackKarmatix 767 - "Indian Flute" [2004]

Show Printable Version | Subscribe to this Thread
Forum Jump:

All times are GMT. The time now is 07:53.

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
 
Search this Thread:

 
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict

Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
Support TA!