Become a part of the TranceAddict community!Frequently Asked Questions - Please read this if you haven'tSearch the forums
TranceAddict Forums > DJing / Production / Promotion > Production Studio > Panning - I'm having trouble
  Last Thread   Next Thread
Share
Author
Thread    Post A Reply
Richard Butler
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Apr 2009
Location: London
Panning - I'm having trouble

Guy's I'm wondering about panning.

I want the step through spacious mix, but lately I seem to have lost the plot on this. I'm talking here about the mixing stage, nothing about mastering or brick wall limiting.

Starting with the pads, they don't sound spacious yet here's what I've done;

Roland X7
Using 8 waveforms slightly detuned from one another.
Roughly 1/2 of those quite hard left, and the other 1/2 right.
Gentle phaser applied.
Quite a long verb and fairly heavy very - but of course with some rolling off of verb fequencies at the low and high ends

Now before someone says use less verb - the reason I've applied quite a lot is that I notice in many of my fave professional tracks the verb on the pads is heavy.

SPECTRUM ENHANCER - I', applying some stereo enhacement to the pads to, and automating the wideness setting gentle thru the track.

The pads have gentle compression just to keep them in check.

Am I missing something key here?

EDIT - Hey I just thought of something;

I habitualy do a senmd to main monitors of ALL SIDE CHAINED SOUNDS, that is to say - I send some of the original non side chained sound on a send to main konitors, but thinking about it now, those sends dont have a pan setting - could this be muddying the mix?


___________________
https://soundcloud.com/butlerrichard

Last edited by Richard Butler on Oct-09-2009 at 09:15

Old Post Oct-09-2009 09:08  United Kingdom
Click Here to See the Profile for Richard Butler Click here to Send Richard Butler a Private Message Add Richard Butler to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
SoundMagus
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Sep 2002
Location: Phuket

Yo,

If you have roughly a 50/50 split with the osc`s why would you then further increase the wideness with the stereo enhancement? Just a thought.

Your idea maybe correct, the sending of the dry sound could be causing some kind of phase cancellation, you could try compressing the hell out of the original source then mix that in unpanned, ie centre setttings and see what happens there.

Sounds messy to me, good luck dood

Mark


___________________
In life there is nought but you, the universe, and experience of both, make the most of them, be free, express yourself and love life !

Psy-Trance Production

Old Post Oct-09-2009 14:17  Thailand
Click Here to See the Profile for SoundMagus Click here to Send SoundMagus a Private Message Visit SoundMagus's homepage! Add SoundMagus to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
evo8
Virtual Wannabe



Registered: Aug 2004
Location:

if u posted a sample we could help you more, but from the settings u described, that pad is gonna take up a awful lot of space in the mix
i wouldnt bother with the seperate stereo enhancement, shouldnt need it
Also what you say about ur send tracks doesnt really make sense, what exactly are on those send tracks?


___________________
hearthis
soundcloud
youtube

Old Post Oct-09-2009 14:50  Ireland
Click Here to See the Profile for evo8 Click here to Send evo8 a Private Message Visit evo8's homepage! Add evo8 to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Eric J
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Nov 2006
Location:
Re: Panning - I'm having trouble

quote:
Originally posted by Richard Butler
Roland X7
Using 8 waveforms slightly detuned from one another.
Roughly 1/2 of those quite hard left, and the other 1/2 right.
Gentle phaser applied.
Quite a long verb and fairly heavy very - but of course with some rolling off of verb fequencies at the low and high ends


Check that in mono, I'll bet its almost disappearing with phase issues. You may want to pan a lot less. I personally never pan more than 20% or so either way, unless I'm doing some crazy double or triple tracking stuff.

quote:
Originally posted by Richard Butler
Now before someone says use less verb - the reason I've applied quite a lot is that I notice in many of my fave professional tracks the verb on the pads is heavy.


Yes, but in many cases, the verb is also gated to remove some of the tail. Verb tails can muddy up a mix in no time. The type of verb is also very important here.

quote:
Originally posted by Richard Butler
SPECTRUM ENHANCER - I', applying some stereo enhacement to the pads to, and automating the wideness setting gentle thru the track.


This will likely make phasing even worse.

quote:
Originally posted by Richard Butler
I habitualy do a senmd to main monitors of ALL SIDE CHAINED SOUNDS, that is to say - I send some of the original non side chained sound on a send to main konitors, but thinking about it now, those sends dont have a pan setting - could this be muddying the mix?


I'm with evo8, don't really understand what you are saying here. Also, this is all very theoretical without a sample.

Old Post Oct-09-2009 14:58  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for Eric J Click here to Send Eric J a Private Message Add Eric J to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
flutlicht junky
in das haus



Registered: Oct 2001
Location: Bournemouth, UK

I think I know what you mean, I quick example for me would be in the Adam Van Bakers latest soundset mp3 demo The Thread is Here , it has a really wide sound to it and I would love to know how its done.

My experiments have been with running synths or pads to a reverb with an EQ removing freq right up to 5k so you just get this very soft high wash and then a widen this


___________________
Kuroi
@ web/Kuroi Music
@ myspace/Kuroi Music

promo track: Mirco de Govia - Voller Sterne (Kuroi Remix)

Old Post Oct-09-2009 17:33  United Kingdom
Click Here to See the Profile for flutlicht junky Click here to Send flutlicht junky a Private Message Visit flutlicht junky's homepage! Add flutlicht junky to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Beatflux
Rising Star in training



Registered: Mar 2006
Location: Planet Alf
Re: Re: Panning - I'm having trouble

quote:
Originally posted by Eric J
Check that in mono,


___________________
quote:
Originally posted by dj_alfi
change your avatar for fucks sake.

Old Post Oct-09-2009 18:16  Trinidad and Tobago
Click Here to See the Profile for Beatflux Click here to Send Beatflux a Private Message Add Beatflux to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
djlogik
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Jun 2005
Location: Rochester, NY

Use a phase analyzer to see whats happening to the mix. Like everyone else is saying, it's probably heavily phasing and you're losing a lot of the sound thanks to cancellation.

Checking it in mono will do the trick as well. I believe Voxengo has a free plugin that'll do that for you.


___________________
Practice doesn't make perfect. Perfect practice makes perfect.

Old Post Oct-12-2009 14:55  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for djlogik Click here to Send djlogik a Private Message Add djlogik to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message

TranceAddict Forums > DJing / Production / Promotion > Production Studio > Panning - I'm having trouble
Post New Thread    Post A Reply

 
Last Thread   Next Thread
Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackobvious trancer!! [2005] [2]

Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackDeepsky - Metro [2004]

Show Printable Version | Subscribe to this Thread
Forum Jump:

All times are GMT. The time now is 06:42.

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
 
Search this Thread:

 
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict

Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
Support TA!