|
Re: HUGE HUGE HUGE case ruling potential in Canada
| quote: | Originally posted by ********
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news...article1335056/
Personally I think the BC supreme court really has no choice but to strike down the law under religious freedom, as I don't think a legally civil practice should be criminalized..
The catholic encylopedia states from English Law
" among those acts injurious to public morality by which the State or community generally is injured,"
But why is it injurious.. revered biblical figures had multiple wives
I can't see the moral issue with a man or woman having multiple lovers? People out of wedlock have sex all the time, and it isn't illegal. If gay marriage is allowed, then why the hell should bigamy a same sex act (usually) not be?
goes on to state
"against the general order of society, and against the law of the Gospel, by which one man and one woman are to be united."
However - how does this account for religious freedom? or even cultural - beleif and conscience
Although among many nations plurality of wives or polygamy has been legally recognized
--------
Personally I think the court has no real choice but to make polygamy legal in Canada - I'd be suprised even if this happened
but frankly the courts really don't have authentic reasonable grounds to call it fundamental justice - as time immemorable doesn't come into play on this one. |
LOL.
I love how before homosexuals got the right to marry. The argument from the anti-crowd was "But if Homos can get married, then polygamy won't be far behind!" to which the pro-crown said "Nonsense, polygamy is entirely different, that'll never happen."
And now the polygamy crowd is going "Well if the homos can get married, we should be able to as well!".
Oh it's funny how things work sometimes.
___________________
Captain Planet is gey.
Water, Fire, Earth, Wind, Heart???
These forces are supposed to combine to create Captain Planet?
Bullshit.
Those forces combine to create a soaking, boiling mudstorm on Valentine's Day.
|