 |
|
|
|
 |
Beatflux
Rising Star in training

Registered: Mar 2006
Location: Planet Alf
|
|
|
| quote: | You talked quite a bit about sound quality when you were doing interviews around your Fabric CD. Do you think that things have gotten better since then?
No. I think the development is going in the opposite direction because everyone is making tracks in programs like Ableton, which has an OK sound engine. When I started making music 20 years ago, you had to at least buy a mixer, then some synthesizers, a drum machine—which is the best quality possible of a sampled drum. There was a pureness of the source of the music. It was analog, direct. Now you have millions of sources, millions of programs and especially these few programs like Reaktor or Ableton that are complete. They have all of these virtual instruments that are calculated by a computer, and you have a certain space where you have to put everything. And when you want to leave this space, you have to live with compromises, the compromises of digital mixes and recordings. Everyone at the moment is thinking these are good things. Especially at the moment with labels disappearing and all of the people that once helped decide whether a record is coming out or not not—the label manager, the friend of the label, the designer—are going away. People are finding it easy to publish something without any controls. And this is the problem with the internet in general. There is so much information, and no one knows if it's true or not. It's just there. It's an information monster. |
___________________
| quote: | Originally posted by dj_alfi
change your avatar for fucks sake. |
|
|
Nov-02-2009 22:55
|
|
|
 |
 |
-FSP-
Supreme tranceaddict

Registered: Aug 2008
Location:
|
|
|
Lack of quality control? Maybe. I like the way things are today though. It makes sense that Villalobos would hate the new system because he gets flooded with crap since there are many labels now, and distribution is cheap.
I'm not a superstar DJ/Producer like Villalobos is. I get zero promos. I'm just a dance music fan. From my perspective, this internet era of dance music really helps me. It makes things harder for guys like Villalobos to find music though.
In the vinyl days, DJs recieved trash records. trash records are always pressed, it's a law of physics. Drop an apple, it'll fall to the ground. Drop a record, there's a chance that it's going to be crap. The law of bad records. This law, through the discovery of the interwebs has transformed into "the law of bad mp3s/wavs"
Now imagine getting flooded with vinyl back in the day, most of which you will use as a coaster for your beer. I imagine the number of songs being submitted to a DJ like Villalobos has increased many times over because all you need is a computer to make a song. From his frame of reference, the crap is magnified and sticks out. At least with vinyl you get a frisbee, and a coaster. What do you get with digital? Oh, drag and drop to recycle bin! YAY.
I remember going into Skills DJ Workshop (RIP) in Berkeley here in California. I had to get my ass to the store which costs time and money. It was like $12 dollars a record. You have to be picky with what you choose. It also takes time to pick a record, listen to it, and put it back to it's rightful place--you don't want to be an asshole customer.
Today I can click from the comfort of my own house and listen to 10 songs quickly and efficiently. The percentage of "songs i don't want" and "songs i want" are the same as before. To me anyways. So I do like this way of buying things. I'm exposed to a lot of music I normally wouldn't hear if we were stuck in vinyl. I think the internet way of buying songs is best for 99% of dance music fans who are just like me--just fans.
A bad day at work for pro DJs is shifting through tons of bad songs on Thursday--the promo listening day. A fun day for me is shifting through audiojelly, beatport, etc., which isn't a job for me, I do it any time i want since there is no "promo listening day" for me. Not a job, no pressure, no stress.
Last edited by -FSP- on Nov-02-2009 at 23:24
|
|
Nov-02-2009 23:07
|
|
|
 |
 |
DigiNut
You kids get off my lawn!

Registered: Dec 2002
Location: Toronto, Self-proclaimed Centre of the Universe
|
|
|
The shift from vinyl to digital media is directly analogous to the shift from print media to online media.
The advantage of traditional media is the steady (if imperfect) vetting of material, the quality control as you put it. The disadvantage is hegemony and cultural bias - groupthink, risk-aversion, stagnation, nepotism, fads and memes taken to cartoonish extremes and dragged on interminably.
At the moment, digital labels/releases are still very new and as a consumer it's difficult to separate the wheat from the chaff. However, I think we will eventually see the same democratic consolidation effects that we've seen with online media and sites/services like digg, reddit, and so on. That is, enterprising individuals, motivated by both profit and personal interest, will invent methods of distributed quality control, harnessing the collective voice of the internet, outsourcing to the individual, and these new services will likely turn out to be almost as good as what the labels did originally.
It will take time, but it will happen. Music distribution has gone online but it is still very "web 1.0". Once it gets its much-needed upgrade then everyone will benefit, including consumers.
___________________
My party schedule:
2009-02-21 - DJ Attention @ I'm So Popular
2009-06-18 - DJ Annoying @ People Need To Know Where I'll Be
2012-11-32 - DJ Insufferable ɸ Or At Least the Stalkers I Complain About
2048-06-66 - Spastic & Whocares ¶ Although I'm Actually Flattered
9999-45-81 - Tweaker Gimp ☼ I Probably Won't Even Go To This But I Have To Make Sure I Fill Up All The Available Space Here
|
|
Nov-02-2009 23:27
|
|
|
 |
 |
kitphillips
is actually a guy.
Registered: May 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by DigiNut
The shift from vinyl to digital media is directly analogous to the shift from print media to online media.
The advantage of traditional media is the steady (if imperfect) vetting of material, the quality control as you put it. The disadvantage is hegemony and cultural bias - groupthink, risk-aversion, stagnation, nepotism, fads and memes taken to cartoonish extremes and dragged on interminably.
At the moment, digital labels/releases are still very new and as a consumer it's difficult to separate the wheat from the chaff. However, I think we will eventually see the same democratic consolidation effects that we've seen with online media and sites/services like digg, reddit, and so on. That is, enterprising individuals, motivated by both profit and personal interest, will invent methods of distributed quality control, harnessing the collective voice of the internet, outsourcing to the individual, and these new services will likely turn out to be almost as good as what the labels did originally.
It will take time, but it will happen. Music distribution has gone online but it is still very "web 1.0". Once it gets its much-needed upgrade then everyone will benefit, including consumers. |
Best post I've read in months.
I think already the music industry is outsourcing to the individual for quality control. Half of the tracks I buy are on recommendation from the TA music discussion board, especially the top 10 monthly threads. usually these are the tracks that people come up to me and ask me about when I play in clubs.
I definately think that digital labels are the quality controllers now anyway. As DJs, we buy tracks on a label that we like because its an assurance of quality. We buy the tracks that are on our favourite DJ's tracklists because we assume that they'll suit our taste. I find trawling through beatport/youtube/TA/tracklists a really enjoyable experience. Its like going exploring in a jungle where you might get ambushed and eaten by anything.
And I certainly value my MP3s as much as my CDs. They're my babies. Maybe thats because I'm from a different generation, and a lot of the media that I love has always been digital, but I certainly don't see a difference. I love the music, not the media its printed on.
I didn't really understand what Villalobos was saying about space in music either. Sounded like he didn't know what he was talking about with software at all. "A certain space where you have to put everything"?
And claiming that a drum machine is the best quality possible of a sampled drum is pretty daft. Kontakt's sampling engine is far more advanced than the 12 bit samples of a drum machine. The drum machine might be more organic in terms of programming, but objectively the quality is going to be inferior. And ableton live certainly isn't a complete program, and neither is Reaktor, and neither of them have anything in common. I find it a bit hard to respect his opinion given that he doesn't seem to know the basics that most people use in music production these days.
___________________
New Mix: March 2010 Promo
Soundcloud|Facebook
|
|
Nov-03-2009 03:16
|
|
|
 |
 |
Storyteller
Supreme tracneaddict

Registered: Feb 2005
Location: The Netherlands
|
|
|
Nov-03-2009 06:52
|
|
|
 |
 |
SoundMagus
Supreme tranceaddict

Registered: Sep 2002
Location: Phuket
|
|
|
I have to agree with Kitphillips, i dont know who this guy is but he sounds like a stale dinosaur who has little knowledge of music production in the digital domain!
Sure there is lots of crap out there, and this mainly comes down to the fact that pretty much anyone can produce music, create a myspace or what not and get it "out there" for the public to listen to.
However there is a hell of a lot of shit Vinyl too, just because there where physical procedures (like printing and pressing) doesnt mean that crap didnt get put out there.
I like the fact that anyone can make music, there is so much variety, good and bad, it just takes a little time and effort to plough through it all and this i can find to be a very enjoyable process.
I also have to agree that using something like Kontakt far outweighs any of the samplers of the past in sheer ability and sound and these tools will only continue to get batter.
It also sounds as if he is afraid of the internet, it being an "information monster". So what? thats whats great about it, the more information the better, if you choose to beleive EVERYTHING you read then your a tool, learn to cross reference, use your own common sense and be objective.
Music is what it is, music, wether or not you like all of it is totally objective, the point is that on the internet you can listen to it first, if you dont like it dont buy it or play it, its not being forced on you its just giving you far more choice than has ever been available in the past, and thats fantastic !
___________________
In life there is nought but you, the universe, and experience of both, make the most of them, be free, express yourself and love life !
Psy-Trance Production
|
|
Nov-03-2009 08:27
|
|
|
 |
 |
Morvan
Senior tranceaddict
Registered: Aug 2009
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
|
|
|
Quality control as in mainstream compatability is not Quality control.
|
|
Nov-03-2009 11:41
|
|
|
 |
 |
kitphillips
is actually a guy.
Registered: May 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by SoundMagus
I have to agree with Kitphillips, i dont know who this guy is but he sounds like a stale dinosaur who has little knowledge of music production in the digital domain!
|
He's a rather large minimal DJ. I like some of his stuff, but I'm surprised to hear how little he knows about modern production.
___________________
New Mix: March 2010 Promo
Soundcloud|Facebook
|
|
Nov-03-2009 12:52
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:17.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|