Is 32gb the largest you can get at this moment in time, or am I looking in the wrong places?! thanks
Dec-22-2009 18:16
smekzg
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Jun 2008
Location: Wanderer's cellphone, son.
you have a Hasselblad or something?
why do you need so much space!?
and yeah, i'm pretty sure that 32 is the biggest now. Stu will know better..
___________________
Dec-22-2009 18:26
gehzumteufel
In your ass
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: so cal
32gb is the biggest for time and all eternity. SDHC maxes out at 32gb. SDXC is anything above 32gb.
___________________
quote:
Originally posted by bas
Dual exhaust tips on dual exhaust = QUAD EXHAUST = 300 gain in horsepower. Duh
quote:
Originally posted by bas
Undies with a dickhole aren't good for guys. Your balls can get caught in them. That's why I prefer to go over the gate instead of through the fence.
Dec-22-2009 18:31
EarnYourKeep
LIT
Registered: Dec 2001
Location: twentyonetwo
quote:
Originally posted by gehzumteufel
32gb is the biggest for time and all eternity. SDHC maxes out at 32gb. SDXC is anything above 32gb.
dont listen to this guy he doesn't know anything about electronics, he tried to make me buy a windows phone!
___________________
I PUT TRADEMARKS AROUND YO MOTHAFUCKIN EYE
JUST ME N YOU
Dec-22-2009 18:41
Ian
Not dead yet.
Registered: Dec 2001
Location: UK
quote:
Originally posted by smekzg
you have a Hasselblad or something?
why do you need so much space!?
and yeah, i'm pretty sure that 32 is the biggest now. Stu will know better..
I seriously have no idea what to do tbh. I have hd shooting video-wise which would be good and just would rather pay a tiny bit more for a load more space, a lways have plenty than not enough. Also since I plan to keep this camera for upto 10+ years if possible, then it makes sense to buy once
Thanks Ben, question sorted
Dec-22-2009 18:42
Sushipunk
Flickering, I roam
Registered: Sep 2006
Location: Chateau Verdafloor
What sort of camera, Ian?
___________________
Dec-22-2009 21:32
Ian
Not dead yet.
Registered: Dec 2001
Location: UK
quote:
Originally posted by Sushipunk
What sort of camera, Ian?
Looks pretty good. Leica lenses are among the best for point-and-shoot cameras.
Aperture could be a little better, but it's certainly not bad.
___________________
Dec-22-2009 21:41
Ian
Not dead yet.
Registered: Dec 2001
Location: UK
Aye. I mean I don't need an SLR, i will never be that good but I like to take pics and esp when I'm abroad, recapture the moments, and often on my old camera they just never came out right, but this has good reviews and I took some advise from people before going for it. Should do what I need
Dec-22-2009 21:51
Sushipunk
Flickering, I roam
Registered: Sep 2006
Location: Chateau Verdafloor
quote:
Originally posted by Ian
Aye. I mean I don't need an SLR, i will never be that good but I like to take pics and esp when I'm abroad, recapture the moments, and often on my old camera they just never came out right, but this has good reviews and I took some advise from people before going for it. Should do what I need
Yeah, it's a bit of a pain in the arse travelling with a DSLR too. I'm heading off on holiday for a week or so this afternoon, and my camera backpack is loaded up with cam + 2 big lenses + 3 small lenses + flash + laptop
The Panasonic will take great pics, I'm sure
___________________
Dec-22-2009 21:59
smekzg
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Jun 2008
Location: Wanderer's cellphone, son.
speaking of SLRs
Stu, can you recommend me a cheap entry level DSLR?
i was looking at these two: Alpha 300 and E520 but i dunno..
should i go with one of them or is there a better option(in the similar price range)?
___________________
Dec-22-2009 22:33
Sushipunk
Flickering, I roam
Registered: Sep 2006
Location: Chateau Verdafloor
quote:
Originally posted by smekzg
speaking of SLRs
Stu, can you recommend me a cheap entry level DSLR?
i was looking at these two: Alpha 300 and E520 but i dunno..
should i go with one of them or is there a better option(in the similar price range)?
Out of those 2, I'd probably recommend the Sony, purely as the sensor quality is better. I don't know too much about Sony/Olympus gear though, since all my gear is Canon. Both of those cams have the advantage of having image stabilisation in the body itself, rather than in the lens, but I'd still recommend checking out some of the entry level Canon cams.
The Canon xSi/450D is still a pretty good (and cheap) buy for an entry level camera. You just have to work out what kind of lens you want to use with it. The kit lenses you get with the body are never really that good (mostly, anyway).
Edit: The Olympus cam there is also pretty fucking small. My gf has an E620 for a back-up body and I find it annoying to use, since I have big hands.