The term Trance is now as vague as what we would call Dance music.

Its a dead term which means nothing anymore.

___________________


http://soundcloud.com/subtara

i dont think trance is dead(its still alive in a lot of underground clubs in nyc) but i agree that these 2 songs are not trance ,but yes trance is so vague that it now has so many classifications.

___________________
fiverr.com/bertsbeats

quote:

Originally posted by crazedonee i dont think trance is dead(its still alive in a lot of underground clubs in nyc) but i agree that these 2 songs are not trance ,but yes trance is so vague that it now has so many classifications.

Trance is definitely not dead, its just been labeled to death.

___________________


http://soundcloud.com/subtara

you could say anything with a hypnotic element or elements is trance
this can cover almost any type of music and is so often the case in todays edm world.

hence so many debates on these types of music forums.

___________________
http://soundcloud.com/
owien-us

-16th note percussion
-16th note lead
-16th note bassline
-use of sustained elements for background tracks
-Plucky Lead
-wall of sound mix
-Chopped Vocals

___________________

quote:

Originally posted by dj_alfi change your avatar for fucks sake.

Overblown synths, 5 minute breakdowns, unicorns.

___________________
Latest releases:
Endless Cycles [Capital Heaven]
The Charlatan [Morphosis]

Trance has a longer phrase length than techno, is higher BPM than house, tends to use straighter basslines than house. Also uses more synthesised elements than either.

Thats my opinion anyway. I'm a bit over genres, don't think they're very helpful.

___________________
New Mix: March 2010 Promo
Soundcloud|Facebook

quote:

Originally posted by kitphillips I'm a bit over genres, don't think they're very helpful.

Agreed; I think they can only limit people as an artist.

quote:

Originally posted by mfitterer1 Agreed; I think they can only limit people as an artist.

That's complete bullshit, categorizing your music based on what similarities it bears to already defined genres doesn't inhibit experimentation within those genres at all. Unless you're creating music specifically to fit those categories, but who does that?

I think genres are fine as long as people treat their conventions as suggestions rather than as a rulebook.

I think categorisation is a good thing, but it falls apart when you start trying to talk about YOUR categories to someone else. Because they have a completely different idea of what trance is, or prog is, or techno is. It just causes more confusion.

I can see the benefit of making tracks that fit certain genres though. Its good to have a basis of what the standard production techniques are for a generic track in a genre before you start taking those techniques and mashing them together to create a new fusion of genres.

___________________
New Mix: March 2010 Promo
Soundcloud|Facebook

Last edited by kitphillips on Jun-29-2010 at 17:20