If less is more think about how much more more would be.
-Frasier
Nov-11-2010 15:44
J.L.
Never gonna give you up.
Registered: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto, Canada
you could try to take a look to see if it contains any information above 16000 khz using a spectral analyzer....
But you can't really "tell" unless you have the sample it is "supposed" to sound like.
If the sample is crap to begin with, it will sound like crap no matter how you encode it.
Nov-11-2010 15:47
summermadness
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Apr 2007
Location: Cologne
I see. Somehow I thought that it's possible "seeing" if it's a re-encode using spectral tools
___________________
---
so much music, so little time...
Nov-11-2010 15:53
J.L.
Never gonna give you up.
Registered: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto, Canada
No.. for example
if this is 128 kbs
2-2-0-0-2-2-2-0-
when you re-encode it to 320 kbs it will add extra information making it something like:
2221000122222100
the only thing you can tell is that there 16 digits of information versus the 8 digits of information. The extra 1's added in there are to estimate what the value would be in between the 2's and 0's
You can however tell if something sounds like crap or not, because ultimately your ears judge what something sounds good, not the encoding
I suppose there may be tools out there to detect such things, but then that's not in the scope of what I undersatnd
Nov-11-2010 16:12
summermadness
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Apr 2007
Location: Cologne
thanks JL for the detailed answer!
___________________
---
so much music, so little time...
Nov-11-2010 16:26
Zak McKracken
Trance
Registered: Jun 2003
Location:
quote:
Originally posted by J.L.
2221000122222100
i thought computers only worked 1s and 0s (on/off)?
Nov-11-2010 17:17
J.L.
Never gonna give you up.
Registered: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto, Canada
well yes... but then again the example wasn't meant to be binary... just to show what it means when a lower quality means that there will be an interpolation between 2 points