 |
|
|
|
 |
sicc
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Dec 2010
Location: Seattle, Washington
|
|
|
I've produced several tracks in this manner. I usually would get the main part of the track created first - the chorus, if you will. Then after that I began to construct an intro that progressively brings everything in the main melody/chorus and all elements included in it, together. To start I would usually play a the beat, w/o the percussive elements and begin to play very little parts of the main melody, like one chord, then eventually begin to play two chords of the whole melody, until it sounded like it was time to either make a drop and bring everything in full force or just open up the entire melody. Its fucking tricky to get it to work to my liking, but its usually how I end up producing. As the intro progresses and I begin to play more chords of the main melody, I begin to try and subtly bring in other elements, like small portions of the bass line or any other synths that i have playing in the main part of my track. I usually automate some effects in the intro along with all this to really bring the energy of the track to light; like gradually applying more cut off until it gets to the point I Want the chorus to sound like.
This reply doesnt seem to be very clear, I'm sorry if its of no help but thats how I have found things to work, and after I build the intro, I can then more easily add and create brakedowns and bridge certain parts of the track. Blocks for me are a vital in this method; If I dont use them it becomes a HUGE mess.
|
|
Apr-08-2011 01:24
|
|
|
 |
 |
EddieZilker
This is the dance.

Registered: Jan 2009
Location: Marijuana Sex Camp
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by DJRYAN™
block mode? Do you mean "bars" in the arrangement. Kind of like snap to grid. And then rearrange it? I think I know what your talking about. Its just a matter of organizing the song. Adding in some effects. Buildups. Etc. I think that's my problem. At this point, I normally break out my midi controller, and live mix the track. But what I've noticed, is that going back and modifying the automations I made with my controller is just as daunting as just going ahead and reorganizing the track. I'm also confronted with the beat. I went ahead and copied the pattern to the track. And now I'm task'd with having to get back in there, and delete bits and pieces of the pattern to build the song. Insead of, what I've normally done, and used my midi controller to mute and unmute different pieces of the pattern, to form the structure of the song.
So if I'm understanding you correctly. I'm gonna have to get in rearrange the song.. Got it.. |
Be sure and check my edit.
And, Yeah. Take your time with it. There's tons of things you can modify from pitch and rhythm to velocity and other things. What I'll do is flip it back into song mode so I can hear the adjustments I've made, in the context of the song. When I was first starting out, pattern shifting and progression sucked, but, like all things, you get better at doing it and then it's one of the easy parts and you're frustrated by the next new mega-whale-turd you have to comprehend.
EDIT: - Not the first, more important edit -
You can still do automation but do that only in song mode. Basically, that will allow you to modify something that's changing on its own and that can really give a track drive.
___________________

Now with extra singles!
my old stuff, not quite up to snuff - but I still dig it - UPDATED 9/23/2012
|
|
Apr-08-2011 01:24
|
|
|
 |
 |
EddieZilker
This is the dance.

Registered: Jan 2009
Location: Marijuana Sex Camp
|
|
|
Apr-08-2011 01:34
|
|
|
 |
 |
EddieZilker
This is the dance.

Registered: Jan 2009
Location: Marijuana Sex Camp
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by DJRYAN™
track arrangement looks good. Wonder what it sounds like =)
how do you like Reason 5 compared to 4? |
That's only about a third of the arrangement, I think. It sounds kind of like yours, only faster and better. 
I was actually using Reason 3 before that, so, just counting Thor, ReGroove, Dr. Octorex and Kong, not to mention the afforementioned new sequencer lay-out, it fucking mega-rocks. I've also noticed that they've made some adjustments to timing accuracy, as when I've imported tracks from Reason into Sonar I used to have to line up the plosives manually. The inaccuracies kind of looked like this:

It pays to have it lined up, perfectly, because it muddles the sound, otherwise.

The last song I was working on, I didn't even notice the muddy sounding drums but I went ahead and checked, as sometimes your ears get sloppy and it didn't need any finessing, whatsoever. It was just lined up, right where it was supposed to be. 
___________________

Now with extra singles!
my old stuff, not quite up to snuff - but I still dig it - UPDATED 9/23/2012
|
|
Apr-08-2011 01:58
|
|
|
 |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:35.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|