|
Just what is djmag's issue with trance?
My 'top 100 djs of 2011' issue of djmag arrived today. And what a strange issue it is.
Immediately after lasts years top 100 edition, they folowed it up with a 'trance free' edition (despite maintaining the trance record review section). Then throughout the year there are snidey comments deriding the scene, its popularity, its 'lowest common denominator status' and various other disparaging notes.
This year, introducing the top 100 poll section, dj mag proclaim 'house has finally taken over'. They then wax lyrical in the second paragraph with statements like:-
'it could be argued that its (poll) dominance by trance djs is declining'
'...that trance djs are broadening their palettes', citing Tiesto and Armin.
'many trance djs seem to be describing their sound as melodic dance these days'
It cites 'falls down the chart' for PVD, Emery, Ferry and ATB. Then pisses on its own arguement by citing the climb of W&W, Dada Life, D Block and the debuts of Orjan, Tritonal and Tenishia.
All of the above maybe true, but the tone it is written in smacks of a smugness that a house dj is top of the pile. How odd when you consider dj mag used to really campaign for the underground, yet it celebrates Guetta being number 1 like all their Christmases have come at once. Even stranger when you hear the second cd of Guetta's new album and find it is doiminated by commercial Euro trance.
The whole tone undermines the scene. I suggest reading it because Im not doing the article the disservice that it deserves here.
Earlier in the mag a nice review of the Jam and Spoon remix of Age of Love then ends with a parting shot that 'trance, meanwhile, is apparently still around'.
The magazine over the years seems to take great pride hammering and taking subtle pot shots at the genre that it does not afford to other genres.
|