Become a part of the TranceAddict community!Frequently Asked Questions - Please read this if you haven'tSearch the forums
TranceAddict Forums > DJing / Production / Promotion > Production Studio > Tony Andrews from Funktion One about the decrease of sound quality
  Last Thread   Next Thread
Share
Author
Thread    Post A Reply
Terrence Parker
1.6180339887



Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Germany
Tony Andrews from Funktion One about the decrease of sound quality


___________________
https://soundcloud.com/j-t-parker

Old Post Jun-11-2012 09:26  Germany
Click Here to See the Profile for Terrence Parker Click here to Send Terrence Parker a Private Message Add Terrence Parker to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Storyteller
Supreme tracneaddict



Registered: Feb 2005
Location: The Netherlands

Ah yes that video comes around every year or so.


___________________

Storyteller Website | Storyteller @ Facebook | Storyteller @ Beatport | Storyteller @ Soundcloud | Stephen J. Kroos - Europa (Storyteller Remix)
Anthony Mea - Get It On (Storyteller Remix)

quote:
If less is more think about how much more more would be.
-Frasier

Old Post Jun-11-2012 12:11  Netherlands
Click Here to See the Profile for Storyteller Click here to Send Storyteller a Private Message Visit Storyteller's homepage! Add Storyteller to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Terrence Parker
1.6180339887



Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Germany

quote:
Originally posted by Storyteller
Ah yes that video comes around every year or so.

Oh sorry didn't see thats from 2010
Maybe some haven't seen it yet


___________________
https://soundcloud.com/j-t-parker

Old Post Jun-11-2012 13:05  Germany
Click Here to See the Profile for Terrence Parker Click here to Send Terrence Parker a Private Message Add Terrence Parker to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
SoulState
tranceaddict in training



Registered: Apr 2008
Location: Cow Farm

Anyone know track ID on 2:42 ?

Old Post Jun-14-2012 20:51 
Click Here to See the Profile for SoulState Click here to Send SoulState a Private Message Visit SoulState's homepage! Add SoulState to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
meriter
-



Registered: May 2009
Location:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6sKTo1G362U&t=1m5s

Old Post Jun-14-2012 21:06 
Click Here to See the Profile for meriter Click here to Send meriter a Private Message Add meriter to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Richard Butler
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Apr 2009
Location: London

quote:
Originally posted by meriter
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6sKTo1G362U&t=1m5s



Cheers, not hear that before, what a great track, so hooky.


___________________
https://soundcloud.com/butlerrichard

Old Post Jun-14-2012 23:20  United Kingdom
Click Here to See the Profile for Richard Butler Click here to Send Richard Butler a Private Message Add Richard Butler to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
DJ RANN
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: May 2001
Location: Hollywood....

quote:
Originally posted by Storyteller
Ah yes that video comes around every year or so.


Yep. It's the defacto argument against mp3 being played in clubs.

quote:
Originally posted by RB
Cheers, not hear that before, what a great track, so hooky.


Seriously? You've never heard that before?

Old Post Jun-15-2012 01:10 
Click Here to See the Profile for DJ RANN Click here to Send DJ RANN a Private Message Add DJ RANN to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Looney4Clooney
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Apr 2010
Location:

lol

massenburg makes a better more qualitative argument but i still think they exaggerate the issue and his methods are flawed in that revealing null tests and what is different does not mean this is what you hear. I think he doesn't quite understand how mp3's work and they and all seem to have an agenda. George claims music today is just bad and that is why music is not mixed well, the other guy is just a snob that is out of touch.

develop an audio format that allows easy tagging and market it and it will catch on. THat is the only reason why flac is not ever going to be big. People need that picture instead of the file type. Also , it will have to coincide with download speed in USA which is damn slow so nobody is going to budge for a while. And make people care. unfortunately nobody does. A 128 mp3 is good enough for 95% of music consumers.


___________________
"This is why Superman works alone." GC
old stuff from days gone by (2001-2004)
Mad For Brad's gay little contest

Old Post Jun-15-2012 02:39 
Click Here to See the Profile for Looney4Clooney Click here to Send Looney4Clooney a Private Message Add Looney4Clooney to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
meriter
-



Registered: May 2009
Location:

what if


hey guys what if like


HEY.. okay like, imagine if like, in 100,000 years humans have evolved to the point where we actually CAN hear the difference between 44.1khz and 96khz. Like our ears evolved or whatever. And then like the people go back in time and listen to our music and it sounds TERRIBLE because we made everything at 44.1khz, wouldn't it be worth making music at the higher sample rate, like for our children? And our children's children? Think about it.

Old Post Jun-15-2012 03:38 
Click Here to See the Profile for meriter Click here to Send meriter a Private Message Add meriter to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Beatflux
Rising Star in training



Registered: Mar 2006
Location: Planet Alf

quote:
Originally posted by DJ RANN
Yep. It's the defacto argument against mp3 being played in clubs.



Seriously? You've never heard that before?


I wonder how much difference a wav versus a 320 would make.

All of the bad sound experiences I have had were either blown speakers, or some idiot redlining the mixer.


___________________
quote:
Originally posted by dj_alfi
change your avatar for fucks sake.

Old Post Jun-15-2012 04:10  Trinidad and Tobago
Click Here to See the Profile for Beatflux Click here to Send Beatflux a Private Message Add Beatflux to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Looney4Clooney
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Apr 2010
Location:

quote:
Originally posted by meriter
what if


hey guys what if like


HEY.. okay like, imagine if like, in 100,000 years humans have evolved to the point where we actually CAN hear the difference between 44.1khz and 96khz. Like our ears evolved or whatever. And then like the people go back in time and listen to our music and it sounds TERRIBLE because we made everything at 44.1khz, wouldn't it be worth making music at the higher sample rate, like for our children? And our children's children? Think about it.


i would say if anything. our hearing will degrade in terms of evolution. We don't need it. By then they will have ways to put things directly into your brain. Skip the ears basically.


___________________
"This is why Superman works alone." GC
old stuff from days gone by (2001-2004)
Mad For Brad's gay little contest

Old Post Jun-15-2012 04:11 
Click Here to See the Profile for Looney4Clooney Click here to Send Looney4Clooney a Private Message Add Looney4Clooney to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
meriter
-



Registered: May 2009
Location:

quote:
Originally posted by Beatflux
I wonder how much difference a wav versus a 320 would make.

All of the bad sound experiences I have had were either blown speakers, or some idiot redlining the mixer.


I've heard 320mp3s to wavs back to back on a proper funktion-one setup and it is indeed 'noticeable', and the difference from 320mp3s to vinyl is 'obvious.' Of course not to everyone, but it's noticeable to me, the owner of the venue, many of the regulars and the other producers that play there. Despite popular belief there are still people who demand a higher standard. I think what you get with 320mp3s is people just get this vague sense that there's something missing but it's not a conscious thing.

But to be fair it's mostly the mix. Like a wav of a shittily mixed track is still going to sound shitty. These old classic rock recordings put down to analog tape sound amazing even as 192mp3s, so there's that.

Old Post Jun-15-2012 04:42 
Click Here to See the Profile for meriter Click here to Send meriter a Private Message Add meriter to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message

TranceAddict Forums > DJing / Production / Promotion > Production Studio > Tony Andrews from Funktion One about the decrease of sound quality
Post New Thread    Post A Reply

 
Last Thread   Next Thread
Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackJ.C. - U R My Love (Original Mix) [2004] [2]

Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackHardsoul - "Back Together" (Seamus Haji Remix) [2005]

Show Printable Version | Subscribe to this Thread
Forum Jump:

All times are GMT. The time now is 23:08.

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
 
Search this Thread:

 
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict

Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
Support TA!