|
| quote: | Originally posted by SYSTEM-J
And based on these tracks, I don't see how you can say this is anywhere near as good as TBU, or even anything like it. The first track (whatever the name) repeats a very simple bleepy-bloop hook, and not much else, for eleven minutes. There is extremely little progression or development across the course of such a long track, so few ideas on display. There are literally about four melodic components and the whole polyphony of the track is that of a straightforward dance record, except stretched out to gigantic proportions and given a sombre, shiny production aesthetic. Every track on TBU is absolutely brimming with ideas, little nuances, changes of direction.
|
It's mostly his other album, the one with the latin name, that's like more like TBU. I was swapping to-and-fro while listening, & got a bit muddled . But for the first track, I agree. However the very simple bleepy-bloop hook happens to charm me a great deal, and I really do enjoy its prolonged repetitiveness (part of what makes trance music trance for me). Also the minimal composition happened to trigger a few sparks in lines with what I was thinking about at the time. I created the thread based upon first impressions & am now following up: I still like Hikari, the second breaks track (the numbers one) is meh, and I suppose I could have posted better examples but w/e internet. aaaand done.
As for TBU, it actually got quite dull for me. I remember finding the jazzy sequences dull (not my style or sound) & the orchestra sequences as lackluster (mainly being a fan of classical this was the deal-breaker for me). But also:
| quote: | Originally posted by SYSTEM-J
Although this thread has reminded me that I haven't listened to TBU for a few years now, need to dig it out again. |
This could very well change my opinions on the whole this album here 'probably' being better than TBU. TBU is very much brimming with ideas and nuances. Being eager to hear new music I, well, listened to new music. 
| quote: | Originally posted by SYSTEM-J
And the title annoys me. The stars aren't eternal. They all die. Quite a few of them have already exploded, the light just won't reach us for several million years yet. So what does your title mean exactly, Brian? |
If I decide the keep remnants of the album in my music library, I'll probably have to do a quick chop on the album cover & name to make it bearable. I'll just have it say 'stars', suits the aesthetic.
| quote: | Originally posted by djshire
But fucking Christ and Hunter, does he infuriate me sometimes with his productions. |
+1
I should have focused the thread about the other album. I think I like it more.
___________________
When a wise man gives thee better counsel, give me mine again: I would have none but knaves follow it, since a fool gives it.
Last edited by infiniteJEST on Jul-03-2012 at 10:16
|