|
I have an mc 505, and well, it s ok. I made some really nice things with it. But if things get really serious, it is too limiting. For the moment I have to control 2 extern synths + a sampler and things get very complicated, an mc505 is not made to do such a things, that's why i'm gonna buy a pc very soon. Another thing is that sequencing difficult leads can be hard sometimes but it is VERY powerfull to sequence drums (tr 909 style) (this song was made using only the mc 505 for sequencing, this could give you an idea what it can do http://users.pandora.be/dezma/DeZmA...pic%20Dream.mp3 ). Synth engine is really good if you do some tweaking, you can make it sound very pro. Sure, (virtual) analog synthesis sounds better then s&s but you can assign 4 tones (samples) to one patch over 8 tracks and each tone can have it's own adsr and filter settings, I consider this as one of the most powerfull features of the mc 505.
Rm1x is a very good alternative for mc 505, 16 track sequencing whereas the mc 505 has only 8 (BUT with 8 rhytm mute tracks) but the synth engine is a lot weaker (2 tones and just one simple lp filter + less adrs posibilities). Also, it is cheaper then a mc505 so If you want kickass sequencing go for rm1x, if synth engine is most important, go for 505.
I would personally not choose a groovebox with onboard sampling.. but a stand alone sampler (such as yamaha a series, emu esi series, akai s series). Of course they are more expensive but then again, you'll go A LOT further with these.
I don't know the korg M, so i won't discuss that one.
Pseudocoder... mc 303 was crap if you compare it to 307 and 505. All those who say 505 sucks never tweaked it or tested the octave button on the low boost
Hope this helped you a bit
Last edited by DeZmA on Oct-02-2002 at 19:16
|