Become a part of the TranceAddict community!Frequently Asked Questions - Please read this if you haven'tSearch the forums
TranceAddict Forums > DJing / Production / Promotion > Production Studio > Sticky : Hardware sequencing vs Software sequencing
  Last Thread   Next Thread
Share
Author
Thread    Post A Reply
DeZmA
Synth Addict



Registered: Jun 2001
Location: Lalaland
Sticky : Hardware sequencing vs Software sequencing

Hi,

I've been saving my money for a while to buy a decent sequencer (mc505 has become too small ) and now I have to decide what to buy. Is hardware really able to sequence a whole track where you just have to hit play and all the rest is automated (ex track mutes, filter sweepes, envelope changes, volume changes, ...) like you can with cubase, sonar 2,..)
Is there a hardw sequencer out there where you can connect a monitor so you can see a pianoroll etc.. ? (should be affordable too )

What do you guys recommand?
For software I've been thinking about cubase and sonar 2 xl
For hardware : yammie rm1x, akai mpc2000 xl

I prefere hardware on software but I don't wanna give double the amount of money just for hardware if you can do the same with software.

Old Post Sep-17-2002 11:07  Belgium
Click Here to See the Profile for DeZmA Click here to Send DeZmA a Private Message Visit DeZmA's homepage! Add DeZmA to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Tom_cowan
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Apr 2002
Location: York, UK

Hardware for doing live stuff, software for doing actual production without a doubt.


___________________
My Space

Electronic Technology!!!

"where east meets west meets moscow meets amsterdam meets dance meets trance meets porsche meets lada meets pravda meets prada meets boy meets girl meets love meets you meets me..."

Old Post Sep-17-2002 14:24  United Kingdom
Click Here to See the Profile for Tom_cowan Click here to Send Tom_cowan a Private Message Add Tom_cowan to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
xls
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Jul 2002
Location: Toronto, Canada

Software rocks for sequencing. It's so much easier and IMO allows you to do much more because of the visual interface. I used to use the sequencer on my XP-50 and once I switched to software I've never looked back.

Old Post Sep-17-2002 14:30  Canada
Click Here to See the Profile for xls Click here to Send xls a Private Message Visit xls's homepage! Add xls to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
jåcë
dancefloor therapist



Registered: Jun 2002
Location: syd.au

hardware isnt really that necessary when it comes to making electronica tracks, digital is just becoming so much more advanced and cheaper to implement (and capturing that same 'analogue type' sound).
hardware is used more with recording and mixing live bands

hope this helps


___________________


:: Out soon ::

»
Adam Jace - Safari People [Plastic City]

http://www.myspace.com/adamjace

Old Post Sep-18-2002 16:36 
Click Here to See the Profile for jåcë Click here to Send jåcë a Private Message Add jåcë to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
hey cheggy
like a tiger



Registered: Aug 2002
Location: Sydney, Australia

Also, if you don't have that many pieces of hardware, for example if you only have the groovebox, then you're better off going with software. Something like cubase xs or logic platinum. They will do you fine for writing tracks. If you are playing out live as someone else said, then you may want hardware.

I think there is also a program called "live" by propellerhead. I'm not sure if i got that right, i think i did. Anyway, this is for performing live although i have absolutely no idea how good/stable it is for live performances.


___________________
1 out of every 4 people in this country are mentally disturbed. Look at your 3 closest friends. If they seem okay, then you're the one.

Old Post Sep-18-2002 16:40  Australia
Click Here to See the Profile for hey cheggy Click here to Send hey cheggy a Private Message Add hey cheggy to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
DeZmA
Synth Addict



Registered: Jun 2001
Location: Lalaland

The live prog (from ableton) is only for audio loops so it is not very usefull for me. I don't have only the groovebox, i also have an a3000, waldorf microq and yammie an1x but this makes only things more complicated and worse to sequence this on the mc505 since you can not assign midi channels per track so I really need something else. I think im going for software now (cubase) and i'm gonna buy an mpc2000 for later on if I wanna go for a very decent live. Thx for the advice

Old Post Sep-18-2002 20:06  Belgium
Click Here to See the Profile for DeZmA Click here to Send DeZmA a Private Message Visit DeZmA's homepage! Add DeZmA to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message

TranceAddict Forums > DJing / Production / Promotion > Production Studio > Sticky : Hardware sequencing vs Software sequencing
Post New Thread    Post A Reply

 
Last Thread   Next Thread
Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackPlease ID,,,, Awesome tune!!!! [2004] [3]

Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playback10th Planet - Ghost [2003]

Show Printable Version | Subscribe to this Thread
Forum Jump:

All times are GMT. The time now is 16:49.

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
 
Search this Thread:

 
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict

Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
Support TA!