|
| quote: | Originally posted by derail
Dithering will be applied by the mastering engineer if they're mastering to a bit depth which will benefit from dithering (for example, 16 bit).
There's no reason to apply dithering to 24 bit audio - I doubt that there's a combination of playback system and human ears which could hear the difference between a dithered and undithered 24 bit file.
Yes, you can dither, but there's absolutely no real-life benefit, and I'd find it interesting on a technical level whether there'd be reasons to dither a 24 bit file prior to the mastering engineer applying the 16 bit dithering.
You can safely provide the 24 bit (undithered) version of your song to a mastering engineer - it'll produce exactly (to any human ears) the same result as providing the 32 bit (undithered) version to them, if the end result is a 16 bit file. |
| quote: | Originally posted by Teezdalien
I'm no mastering engineer but this pretty much sums up my understanding of when and why you dither. The word length of 24 bit or higher encoded audio is sufficient to accurately represent the arithmetic involved, keeping the detail in the sound, you normally add dither when truncating back to 16 bit to fix truncation errors which happen without dithering. I think whenever you process audio in the DAW, it expands the wordlength, so the only time you would need to dither twice is where you encode an analogue source to digital, then truncate that back to 16 bit too.
Perhaps one of the engineers or mastering gurus here can chime in and correct me if I'm wrong. |
Thanks for the responses. Just making sure I wasn't missing an important step in production.
___________________
Songwriter/artist and reluctant producer.
My Soundcloud
|