 |
|
|
|
 |
dj_nomiz
Senior tranceaddict
Registered: Jul 2002
Location: Brisbane
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by PeacefulWarrior
Your teacher was probably talking about the hubble telescope being able to see far away light. Although light particles are really tiny, light consists of matter, or actual "solid stuff." And since matter is neither created nor destroyed (second law of thermodynamics), the light particles that were present at the begining of the universe still exist today.
So the telescope is not seeing the past, but actually something from the past that still exists today in the present. |
huh? but say, a star 2000 light years away from us, which we can visibly see from earth... like a little yellow dot @ night. ok, we are seeing the star that is 2000 years ago (follow?) coz it takes 2000 years for the light of the star to reach us... but as we see that star of the past... the present star actually exploded, and it will take another 2000 years or so for us to realize it has exploded, doesnt that mean we saw the star explode... but in reality, it already exploded 2000 years ago... is that not us witnessing the past?
that explanation just confused me, ne one know more about this stuff?
___________________
under construction
|
|
Sep-29-2002 04:29
|
|
|
 |
 |
PeacefulWarrior
aDdiCtEd to cHUnKy bEaTs

Registered: Jul 2002
Location: Boulder, Colorado
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by dj_nomiz
huh? but say, a star 2000 light years away from us, which we can visibly see from earth... like a little yellow dot @ night. ok, we are seeing the star that is 2000 years ago (follow?) coz it takes 2000 years for the light of the star to reach us... but as we see that star of the past... the present star actually exploded, and it will take another 2000 years or so for us to realize it has exploded, doesnt that mean we saw the star explode... but in reality, it already exploded 2000 years ago... is that not us witnessing the past?
that explanation just confused me, ne one know more about this stuff? |
If we look at the star you're describing, we're just seeing the remnants of that star, or the light particles that the star emitted when it exploded 2000 years ago. So that star doesn't actually exist anymore, just the light from that star remains.
___________________
sig edited: no political imagery allowed. please reref to the sig guidelines
|
|
Sep-29-2002 04:53
|
|
|
 |
 |
dj_nomiz
Senior tranceaddict
Registered: Jul 2002
Location: Brisbane
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by PeacefulWarrior
If we look at the star you're describing, we're just seeing the remnants of that star, or the light particles that the star emitted when it exploded 2000 years ago. So that star doesn't actually exist anymore, just the light from that star remains. |
hmm... true, makes sense, ok i understand wat ur saying now... so is my post about being able to see the past wrong?
___________________
under construction
|
|
Sep-29-2002 05:05
|
|
|
 |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 22:06.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|