pffff

___________________
*Insert cool sig here*

quote:

Originally posted by EldamRy

so are you decrying the US way of life, yet embracing our shitty cars? get your priorities straight|

___________________
'That's like telling a Kodiak bear to stop fcking older men.'

pft... lol check this out

1997-2002 Corvette Twin Turbo LS1, ZO6
427 CID 725 BHP / 650 lbs-ft of torque


http://www.lingenfelter.com/pac725ttls1y.asp


yup... vettes kick ass
btw i made that lol as u can tell

quote:

Originally posted by biznology so are you decrying the US way of life, yet embracing our shitty cars? get your priorities straight|

dude its only a post about cars... no need to get a political on this....

quote:

Originally posted by Trance-Canada dude its only a post about cars... no need to get a political on this....

hey im not trying to...hes just posted in others talking shit.

get some Hennesey Venoms in there|

___________________
'That's like telling a Kodiak bear to stop fcking older men.'

i pick the one which is less likely to have a coffee can muffler on it

>JM<

oh sorry man my bad bout the vipers :/... cloest i could find is Horsepower: 635 BHP @ 5600 rpm
Torque: 655 ft lb @ 4900 rpm and thats only like 5 lbs more than the vette :

quote:

Originally posted by Trance-Canada oh sorry man my bad bout the vipers :/... cloest i could find is Horsepower: 635 BHP @ 5600 rpm Torque: 655 ft lb @ 4900 rpm and thats only like 5 lbs more than the vette :

yah alright...tho i think off the top of my head the 2 turbo viper was pushing at least 800hp...dunno about torque.

this is where we could get into a debate about how intrinsically important torque is...when not just driving around town|

___________________
'That's like telling a Kodiak bear to stop fcking older men.'

Try to get some money first

ONE Dahlback GTI: 1170 lbs/ft. torque, 900 bhp




Cheers!

-ABT-

___________________
Peace.