|
| quote: | Originally posted by DJ RANN
Sadly, damn right.
Taylor swift has sold an estimated 65m singles (including streaming sales).
To date (i.e. her entire catalog and career), she has received less than $500,000 from spotify.
Now factor in that spotify is the largest streaming portal in the world, and that an average EDM track might sell a couple of thousand (at best), you're looking at pennies (literally) paid out by Beatport to their artists for streaming.
I promise you, this is all about make Beatport look attractive as an acquisition down the road. It will yield absolutely fuck all to artists, but Beatport will use the spotify excuse: "But it will give artists exposure to new consumers".
They're basically reinforcing the awful current model of give your work away for free (while large companies make a fortune from it), so you get marketing and exposure and can then eventually make it back on gigs, performances, licensing and merchandise (if you ever get there).
I wonder if they will make it mandatory to allow them to stream your tracks if you want to sell it via beatport....? Cunning wankers |
This has been debunked by Spotify. She was on track to make 6 million $ on spotify in 2014. They expected 12 million for her in 2015. https://news.spotify.com/us/2014/11...n-and-counting/
The 500.000$ Taylor was referring to income just from Spotify US.
Do not forget it is not just services to blame, also the consumers. They too want more for less as it is possible. Also more music sales are more fragmented than ever as over half of the world can listen to whatever they want without TV or radio deciding what they have to listen to. Big artists earn less where small artists still earn very little but at least they have the chance to earn something. It is evening out the music ecosystem. Big artists just have to learn to settle with less.
There has been research by one of the world's leading research firms Nielsen and the results where stunning. Conclusion: You take your music away from a platform you will not make it back anywhere else under normal circumstances. People decide on which platform they consume music, not the artists. If an artist is not present on Spotify but the user is, the likeliness of the user switching to another service is near 0.
Conclusion, less exposure for swift, less income for swift and less fans gained for swift. All in all the ultimate bad management decision.
---
This in relation the Beatport thing, whatever Beatport does it won't really matter. Also, even if they introduce streaming it won't hurt sales. Their clients are dj's. DJ's do stream, but if they need something they either download it illegally (in which case the artist wouldn't make money anyway) or buy it.
___________________
Storyteller Website | Storyteller @ Facebook | Storyteller @ Beatport | Storyteller @ Soundcloud | Stephen J. Kroos - Europa (Storyteller Remix)
Anthony Mea - Get It On (Storyteller Remix)
| quote: | If less is more think about how much more more would be.
-Frasier |
Last edited by Storyteller on Dec-20-2014 at 10:04
|